Literature DB >> 23324199

Factors associated with research wrongdoing in Nigeria.

Omokhoa A Adeleye1, Clement A Adebamowo.   

Abstract

Concerns about research wrongdoing in biomedical research are growing in developing countries, where research ethics training and research regulatory systems are just emerging. In a first-time study in Africa, medical/dental researchers (N = 132) in two states in Nigeria were interviewed on a wide range of research wrongdoings and potential predictors. Using multivariate logistic regression, significant predictors of research wrongdoing were identified. Some 22.0% admitted to at least one of fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism, the predictors of which were knowledge gaps in research ethics and pressure to publish enough papers for promotion. Acknowledging inadequate knowledge of research ethics was a predictor of admitting a wrongdoing. Systems that support ethical research, including skilled training and funding, are recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23324199      PMCID: PMC3619034          DOI: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.5.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  25 in total

1.  What makes clinical research ethical?

Authors:  E J Emanuel; D Wendler; C Grady
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 May 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content.

Authors:  Elizabeth Heitman; Ruth Ellen Bulger
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  A pilot study of biomedical trainees' perceptions concerning research ethics.

Authors:  M W Kalichman; P J Friedman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 4.  Educational approaches for discouraging plagiarism.

Authors:  Beth A Fischer; Michael J Zigmond
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  Public Health Service policies on research misconduct. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2005-05-17

6.  Scientists behaving badly.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) privacy rule: implications for clinical research.

Authors:  Rachel Nosowsky; Thomas J Giordano
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.739

8.  Where are they now?

Authors:  Lucy Odling-Smee; Jim Giles; Ichiko Fuyuno; David Cyranoski; Emma Marris
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Role of systematic reviews in detecting plagiarism: case of Asim Kurjak.

Authors:  Iain Chalmers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-09-16

10.  The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  Nicholas H Steneck; Ruth Ellen Bulger
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.893

View more
  7 in total

1.  Research Misconduct in the Croatian Scientific Community: A Survey Assessing the Forms and Characteristics of Research Misconduct.

Authors:  Vanja Pupovac; Snježana Prijić-Samaržija; Mladen Petrovečki
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Construction and Validation of the Research Misconduct Scale for Social Science University Students.

Authors:  Saba Ghayas; Zaineb Hassan; Sumaira Kayani; Michele Biasutti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-09

3.  Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers.

Authors:  Anke Rohwer; Taryn Young; Elizabeth Wager; Paul Garner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles.

Authors:  Felicitas Hesselmann; Verena Graf; Marion Schmidt; Martin Reinhart
Journal:  Curr Sociol       Date:  2016-10-13

5.  Reliability and validation of an attitude scale regarding responsible conduct in research.

Authors:  Samar Abd ElHafeez; Mohamed Salem; Henry J Silverman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A Cross-Sectional Survey Study to Assess Prevalence and Attitudes Regarding Research Misconduct among Investigators in the Middle East.

Authors:  Marwan Felaefel; Mohamed Salem; Rola Jaafar; Ghufran Jassim; Hillary Edwards; Fiza Rashid-Doubell; Reham Yousri; Nahed M Ali; Henry Silverman
Journal:  J Acad Ethics       Date:  2017-10-13

7.  Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country.

Authors:  Patrick I Okonta; Theresa Rossouw
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.652

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.