| Literature DB >> 31071077 |
Santiago Guerrero1, Andrés López-Cortés1,2, Jennyfer M García-Cárdenas1, Pablo Saa3, Alberto Indacochea4,5, Isaac Armendáriz-Castillo1, Ana Karina Zambrano1, Verónica Yumiceba1, Andy Pérez-Villa1, Patricia Guevara-Ramírez1, Oswaldo Moscoso-Zea3, Joel Paredes1,3, Paola E Leone1, César Paz-Y-Miño1.
Abstract
Scientific data recording and reporting systems are of a great interest for endorsing reproducibility and transparency practices among the scientific community. Current research generates large datasets that can no longer be documented using paper lab notebooks (PLNs). In this regard, electronic laboratory notebooks (ELNs) could be a promising solution to replace PLNs and promote scientific reproducibility and transparency. We previously analyzed five ELNs and performed two survey-based studies to implement an ELN in a biomedical research institute. Among the ELNs tested, we found that Microsoft OneNote presents numerous features related to ELN best functionalities. In addition, both surveyed groups preferred OneNote over a scientifically designed ELN (PerkinElmer Elements). However, OneNote remains a general note-taking application and has not been designed for scientific purposes. We therefore provide a quick guide to adapt OneNote to an ELN workflow that can also be adjusted to other nonscientific ELNs.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31071077 PMCID: PMC6508581 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006918
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Comput Biol ISSN: 1553-734X Impact factor: 4.475
Fig 1Adaptation of Microsoft OneNote’s hierarchical structure to an ELN workflow.
(A) The structure of OneNote (violet) and its adaptation to a scientific setting is presented. (B) A screenshot of a OneNote ELN hierarchical structure is shown. ELN, electronic lab notebook.
Recommendations for data acquisition and presentation using Microsoft OneNote as an ELN.
| Feature | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| All data resulting from any experiment, analysis, observation, etc., must be properly recorded without exception. | |
| Unintentional errors, as well as negative, unexpected, or conflicting results, should also be documented. | |
| All computational-related analyses along with their raw files, such as codes or scripts, should also be recorded. | |
| Raw data generated from any experimental approach could be uploaded within the ELN to promote reproducibility and transparency practices. | |
| Large datasets, such as high-quality images or sequencing files, can be hyperlinked to internal or external hosting platforms. | |
| Protocols and cloning experiments should contain detailed information (e.g., reference and lot number of any material or reagent) to assure reproducibility by other researchers. | |
| Important communications with collaborating researchers, such as e-mails or meeting highlights, may also be documented. | |
| Figures and tables should be self-explained with captions and detailed information. | |
| Improve data presentation by using OneNote tools available at “Insert” or “Draw” tabs (e.g., Microsoft Visio). | |
| Results from long experiments should be documented on a single page; there is no need to create a page for each working day. | |
| Use a single note container all along the experiment’s page to avoid unintentional overlapping of text or images. |
Abbreviation: ELN, electronic lab notebook.
Fig 2A schematic diagram presenting a OneNote ELN-sharing workflow.
OneNote ELNs can be shared among lab members, laboratories, and institutions using two parameters: “can view” and “can edit and view.” ELN, electronic lab notebook.
Fig 3OneNote connectivity.
Several external tools can be used to enhance OneNote ELN usage concerning data accessibility, acquisition, and presentation. ELN, electronic lab notebook.