Literature DB >> 14646749

Analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a community-based implant registry.

Terence J Gioe1, Kathleen K Killeen, Daniel P Hoeffel, Jack M Bert, Thomas K Comfort, Karen Scheltema, Susan Mehle, Katherine Grimm.   

Abstract

Using a unique community implant and explant registry, long-term survival of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty was examined and compared with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) survival. All patients with unicompartmental knee arthroplasties done since September 1, 1991 were followed up prospectively to January 31, 2002 to assess survival and reason for revision. Five hundred sixteen unicompartmental knee arthroplasties of nine different designs were done by 23 surgeons. During this period, 39 of the 516 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties were revised. The major revision reasons for unicompartmental knee arthroplasties were progression of arthritis in the uninvolved compartments (51.3%), aseptic loosening (25.6%), and PE wear (20.5%). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with revision as the end point revealed survival of 92.6% (range, 90.0%-95.2%) at 5 years for these unicompartmental knee arthroplasties and 88.6% (range, 85.0%-92.2%) at 10 years, compared with 94.8% (range, 93.5%-96.0%) at 10 years for primary TKAs. This community registry experience may more accurately reflect the results obtained in community practice, with different surgeons, varying indications, and numerous designs. The current study showed that revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties is done most commonly for progression of arthritis in the contralateral compartment, and at a higher rate than revision of primary cemented TKA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14646749     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000093004.90435.d1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  17 in total

1.  Overstuffed medial compartment after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  B Kerens; N P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  [Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  S Kirschner; J Lützner; S Fickert; K-P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Long-term survivorship and failure modes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jared R H Foran; Nicholas M Brown; Craig J Della Valle; Richard A Berger; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Long-term results with a lateral unicondylar replacement.

Authors:  Jean-Noël A Argenson; Sebastien Parratte; Antoine Bertani; Xavier Flecher; Jean-Manuel Aubaniac
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Reintervention after mobile-bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Marcia Clark; David G Campbell; Greg Kiss; Peter J Dobson; Peter L Lewis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Component Placement Accuracy in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Is Improved with Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Will It Have an Effect on Outcomes?

Authors:  Ryan C Rauck; Jason L Blevins; Michael B Cross
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-12-11

7.  Minimum 10-year follow-up results of ALPINA cementless hydroxyapatite-coated anatomic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  F Lecuire; J B Berard; S Martres
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-03-02

8.  High degree of accuracy of a novel image-free handheld robot for unicondylar knee arthroplasty in a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner; Julie R Smith; Frederic Picard; Brian Hamlin; Philip J Rowe; Philip E Riches
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty database analysis: is there a winner?

Authors:  Matthew C Lyons; Steven J MacDonald; Lyndsay E Somerville; Douglas D Naudie; Richard W McCalden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Partial or total replacement of a unicompartmental knee prosthesis by another unicompartmental knee prosthesis: a reasonable option? About 22 cases.

Authors:  F Lecuire; A Galland; M Basso; H Vinel; J Rubini
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-10-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.