Literature DB >> 18049807

[Minimally invasive unicondylar knee arthroplasty with simultaneous ACL reconstruction : treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis and cruciate ligament defect].

M Tinius1, T M Ecker, S Klima, W Tinius, C Josten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low postoperative pain level, decreased length of hospital stay and accelerated rehabilitation are the major benefits of unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Especially in comparably young, not yet retired and still active patients with an isolated medial gonarthrosis, these prostheses offer many advantages. However, one important requirement to be treated with such implants is a well functioning stability system of the muscles and ligaments. Thus in patients with degenerated or destroyed anterior cruciate ligaments it is contraindicated to use this method. In order to still take advantage of this therapy for treatment of isolated arthrosis, reestablishment of the proprioceptive structures through simultaneous or staged ACL reconstruction is mandatory. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pursuing this goal we performed unicondylar knee arthroplasty with simultaneous ACL reconstruction on eligible patients. Between 2003 and 2006 we treated 32 knees with this combined surgery and followed them for a mean of 31 months (range: 10-38).
RESULTS: The mean Knee Society Score significantly improved from 83.2 (44-103) to 167.6 (145-177) at a mean follow-up of 31 months (10-38).
CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results of this short-term follow-up are promising. Especially the predominant number of patients who were able to return to work soon after rehabilitation and the significantly improved score postoperatively reflect the benefits of this prosthesis system in select patients. However, long-term follow-up and larger case numbers are necessary to confirm these encouraging results in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18049807     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-007-1356-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   0.918


  30 in total

1.  Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision.

Authors:  A J Price; J Webb; H Topf; C A Dodd; J W Goodfellow; D W Murray
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Proprioceptive function, clinical results, and quality of life after unicondylar sledge prostheses.

Authors:  S Fuchs; D Frisse; C O Tibesku; H Laass; D Rosenbaum
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: an independent 10-year survival analysis.

Authors:  Peter Vorlat; Guy Putzeys; Dominique Cottenie; Tom Van Isacker; Nicole Pouliart; Frank Handelberg; Pierre-Paul Casteleyn; Filip Gheysen; René Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-05-14       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  [Transposition osteotomy on the knee joint].

Authors:  J Pfeil; E Hasch
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2005 May-Jun

5.  The untreated anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Authors:  W J McDaniel; T B Dameron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Effect of high tibial flexion osteotomy on cartilage pressure and joint kinematics: a biomechanical study in human cadaveric knees. Winner of the AGA-DonJoy Award 2004.

Authors:  J D Agneskirchner; C Hurschler; C Stukenborg-Colsman; A B Imhoff; P Lobenhoffer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2004-08-03       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Unicompartmental arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthrosis of the knee. A comparative study with a 12- to 17-year follow-up period.

Authors:  A E Weale; J H Newman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Medium-term results of the AMC-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Guido Saxler; Dieter Temmen; Gustav Bontemps
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger.

Authors:  Donald W Pennington; John J Swienckowski; William B Lutes; Gregory N Drake
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Patient outcomes following unicompartmental or bicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  C M Callahan; B G Drake; D A Heck; R S Dittus
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Satisfactory outcomes following combined unicompartmental knee replacement and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrea Volpin; S G Kini; D E Meuffels
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in association with medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a retrospective study comparing clinical and radiological outcomes of two different implant design.

Authors:  Andrea Tecame; Roberto Savica; Michele Attilio Rosa; Paolo Adravanti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Is combined robotically assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a good solution for the young arthritic knee?

Authors:  Constant Foissey; Cécile Batailler; Jobe Shatrov; Elvire Servien; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  ACL reconstruction with unicondylar replacement in knee with functional instability and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Srikrishna R S R Krishnan; Ray Randle
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 2.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.