Literature DB >> 16365783

Feature binding and episodic retrieval in blindness for congruent stimuli: evidence from analyses of sequential congruency.

Chris Oriet1, Biljana Stevanovski, Pierre Jolicoeur.   

Abstract

Targets are identified more poorly when presented during a congruent cued response than during an incongruent cued response (blindness effect). The authors investigated sequential trial dependencies in the blindness effect. The results show that the size of the blindness effect depends both on the previous cued response-target congruency relationship and on repetition of events from the preceding trial. This finding suggests that cued responses and targets become linked together in a single episodic trace; repeating one of these events from the preceding trial activates the other. Depending on whether the activated representation matches or conflicts with events on the current trial, target identification performance is either facilitated or impaired. Implications for action planning and feature binding are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16365783     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0034-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  17 in total

1.  Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli.

Authors:  P Wühr; J Müsseler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Lengthening the duration of response execution does not modulate blindness to action-compatible stimuli.

Authors:  Chris Oriet; Biljana Stevanovski; Pierre Jolicoeur; William B Cowan
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2003-03

3.  Can blindness to response-compatible stimuli be observed in the absence of a response?

Authors:  Biljana Stevanovski; Chris Oriet; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Birgit Stürmer; Hartmut Leuthold; Eric Soetens; Hannes Schröter; Werner Sommer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.

Authors:  B Hommel; J Müsseler; G Aschersleben; W Prinz
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.579

6.  Feature integration across perception and action: event files affect response choice.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-08

7.  Blindness to response-compatible stimuli.

Authors:  J Müsseler; B Hommel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Auditory S-R compatibility: reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence.

Authors:  J R Simon; J V Hinrichs; J L Craft
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-10

9.  Negative priming for spatial locations: identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition.

Authors:  J Park; N Kanwisher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  8 in total

1.  The manifestation of attentional capture: facilitation or IOR depending on task demands.

Authors:  Juan Lupiáñez; María Ruz; María Jesús Funes; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-07

2.  Repetition costs in word identification: evaluating a stimulus-response integration account.

Authors:  Bruce Milliken; Juan Lupianez
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-14

3.  Intentional control of attention: action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions.

Authors:  Sabrina Fagioli; Bernhard Hommel; Ricarda Ines Schubotz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-11-30

4.  Instruction-induced feature binding.

Authors:  Dorit Wenke; Robert Gaschler; Dieter Nattkemper
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-10

5.  The role of cue-response mapping in motorvisual impairment and facilitation: evidence for different roles of action planning and action control in motorvisual dual-task priming.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke; Brian Hopkins; R Christopher Miall
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Intentional weighting: a basic principle in cognitive control.

Authors:  Jiska Memelink; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-12

7.  The planning and control model (PCM) of motorvisual priming: reconciling motorvisual impairment and facilitation effects.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke; Brian Hopkins; R Christopher Miall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Investigating ideomotor cognition with motorvisual priming paradigms: key findings, methodological challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.