Literature DB >> 12674366

Lengthening the duration of response execution does not modulate blindness to action-compatible stimuli.

Chris Oriet1, Biljana Stevanovski, Pierre Jolicoeur, William B Cowan.   

Abstract

Action-compatible blindness refers to the finding that target stimuli are perceived less frequently if they are presented during the planning or execution of a compatible action (e.g., a left arrow presented during a left manual key press) than during an incompatible action (Müsseler & Hommel, 1997 a, b). We investigated the effect of lengthening the response execution phase in the action-compatible blindness paradigm by requiring subjects to tap a response key once or three times on the assumption that tapping three times would increase the duration of the execution phase of the response. Prior research (e.g., Stevanovski, Oriet, & Jolicoeur, 2002; Wühr & Müsseler, 2001) has shown that larger blindness effects are observed for targets presented during the execution phase of a response than after the response has been made. We investigated whether a larger blindness effect would be observed in the three-tap condition than in the one-tap condition, or whether lengthening the duration of the response would extend the time course of the blindness effect. Neither of these possibilities was supported by the data irrespective of whether the number of taps to be made was blocked or mixed within a block of trials. The results are discussed in terms of current accounts of action-compatible blindness and the possible cognitive differences between making a single response and repeating a response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12674366     DOI: 10.1037/h0087409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1196-1961


  4 in total

1.  Feature binding and episodic retrieval in blindness for congruent stimuli: evidence from analyses of sequential congruency.

Authors:  Chris Oriet; Biljana Stevanovski; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-20

2.  The planning and control model (PCM) of motorvisual priming: reconciling motorvisual impairment and facilitation effects.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke; Brian Hopkins; R Christopher Miall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Visuomotor and motorvisual priming with different types of set-level congruency: evidence in support of ideomotor theory, and the planning and control model (PCM).

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke; R Christopher Miall; Miriam Rueß; Puja R Mehta; Brian Hopkins
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-07-29

4.  Investigating ideomotor cognition with motorvisual priming paradigms: key findings, methodological challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.