Literature DB >> 10591839

Changes in bone mass and bone turnover following ankle fracture.

B M Ingle1, S M Hay, H M Bottjer, R Eastell.   

Abstract

Bone loss and increased bone turnover are recognized local changes after a fracture, but the exact patterns of these changes after different fractures are unclear. We aimed to investigate the changes in bone density and biochemical markers following ankle fracture. Fourteen subjects (7 postmenopausal women and 7 men, mean age 63 years) were recruited following fracture of the distal tibia and fibula. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the ankle and proximal femur were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the calcaneus at 0, 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after fracture. Serum and urine samples were collected at 0, 3 and 7 days and at 2, 4, 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after fracture to measure markers of bone turnover. For bone formation we measured: bone alkaline phosphatase (iBAP), osteocalcin (Oc), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP); and for bone resorption: tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAcP), deoxypyridinoline (iFDpd), N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTx). We used the nonfractured limb to calculate values for baseline BMD and QUS. There was a significant decrease in BMD at the ultradistal ankle (p<0.001), the trochanteric region of the hip (p<0.01) and QUS of the heel after ankle fracture. This bone loss was maximal for ultradistal ankle BMD by 6 weeks at 13% (p<0.001) and for the trochanter by 26 weeks at 3% (p<0.01). The ankle BMD returned to baseline at 52 weeks but the trochanter BMD did not. Velocity of sound (VOS) decreased at 6 weeks by 2% (p<0.01) and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) by 15% (p<0.01). VOS recovered completely by 52 weeks, but BUA did not return to baseline. Bone formation markers increased significantly between 1 and 4 weeks by 11-78% (p<0.01), and iBAP returned to baseline at 52 weeks but PINP and Oc remained elevated. Bone resorption markers did not increase and NTx was decreased at 52 weeks. We conclude that BMD decreased distal and immediately proximal to the fracture line when measured with DXA and QUS. Ankle BMD and heel VOS recovered at 52 weeks (trochanteric BMD and heel BUA did not) and the bone turnover markers returned toward baseline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10591839     DOI: 10.1007/s001980050247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  20 in total

1.  [Periprosthetic bone loss after total hip endoprosthesis. Dependence on the type of prosthesis and preoperative bone configuration].

Authors:  A Roth; G Richartz; K Sander; A Sachse; R Fuhrmann; A Wagner; R-A Venbrocks
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Changes in bone mass and bone turnover following tibial shaft fracture.

Authors:  S W Veitch; S C Findlay; A J Hamer; A Blumsohn; Richard Eastell; B M Ingle
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Serum 25(OH)D is associated with an altered bone turnover marker response after a hip fracture.

Authors:  Christopher C Stewart; Nathan N O'Hara; Denise Orwig; Marc C Hochberg; Sheila Sprague; Jay Magaziner; Gerard P Slobogean
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Bone mineral density of the tarsals and metatarsals with reloading.

Authors:  Mary Kent Hastings; Judy Gelber; Paul K Commean; Fred Prior; David R Sinacore
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2008-04-03

5.  Clinical microwave tomographic imaging of the calcaneus: a first-in-human case study of two subjects.

Authors:  Paul M Meaney; Douglas Goodwin; Amir H Golnabi; Tian Zhou; Matthew Pallone; Shireen D Geimer; Gregory Burke; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 6.  Recent advances in the use of serological bone formation markers to monitor callus development and fracture healing.

Authors:  Marlon O Coulibaly; Debra L Sietsema; Travis A Burgers; Jim Mason; Bart O Williams; Clifford B Jones
Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.807

7.  Predictors of bone loss after hip fracture.

Authors:  Lois E Wehren; William G Hawkes; J Richard Hebel; Denise Orwig; Sheryl I Zimmerman; Kathleen M Fox; Janet Yu-Yahiro; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in chronic kidney disease stages 4 to 5D: a call for a shift from nihilism to pragmatism.

Authors:  P Evenepoel; J Cunningham; S Ferrari; M Haarhaus; M K Javaid; M-H Lafage-Proust; D Prieto-Alhambra; P U Torres; J Cannata-Andia
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Modulation of the inflammatory response for enhanced bone tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Paschalia M Mountziaris; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.389

10.  Sequential changes of bone metabolism in normal and delayed union of the spine.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Ohishi; Masaaki Takahashi; Akihiro Yamanashi; Daisuke Suzuki; Akira Nagano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.