Literature DB >> 16360564

In a randomized controlled trial, patients preferred electronic data collection of breast cancer risk-factor information in a mammography setting.

Erin J Aiello1, Stephen Taplin, Robert Reid, Maria Hobbs, Deborah Seger, Hakim Kamel, Jim Tufano, Rachel Ballard-Barbash.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated patient acceptance of an electronic questionnaire to collect breast cancer risk-factor data in a mammography setting.
METHODS: We developed an electronic questionnaire on a tablet computer incorporating prefilled answers and skip patterns. Using a randomized controlled study design, we tested the survey in a mammography clinic that administers a paper risk-factor questionnaire to every woman at her screening mammogram. We randomized 160 women to use the electronic survey (experimental group, n = 86) or paper survey (control group, n = 74). We evaluated patient acceptance and data completeness.
RESULTS: Overall, 70.4% of the experimental group women thought the survey was very easy to use, compared to 55.6% of women in the control group. Ninety percent of experimental group women preferred using the tablet, compared to the paper questionnaire. Preference for the tablet did not differ by age; however, women > or = 60 years did not find the tablet as easy to use as did women < 60 years. The proportion of missing data was significantly lower on the tablet compared to the paper questionnaire (4.6% vs. 6.2%, P = .04).
CONCLUSION: Electronic questionnaires are feasible to use in a mammography setting, can improve data quality, and are preferred by women regardless of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16360564     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  19 in total

Review 1.  Self-report measures of medication adherence behavior: recommendations on optimal use.

Authors:  Michael J Stirratt; Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob; Heidi M Crane; Jane M Simoni; Susan Czajkowski; Marisa E Hilliard; James E Aikens; Christine M Hunter; Dawn I Velligan; Kristen Huntley; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Cynthia S Rand; Eleanor Schron; Wendy J Nilsen
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Access to chronic disease care in general practice: the acceptability of implementing systematic waiting-room screening using computer-based patient-reported risk status.

Authors:  Christine L Paul; Mariko Carey; Sze Lin Yoong; Catherine D'Este; Meredith Makeham; Frans Henskens
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Validation and Assessment of a Technology Familiarity Score in Patients Attending a Symptomatic Breast Clinic.

Authors:  C O'Brien; J Kelly; E A Lehane; V Livingstone; B Cotter; A Butt; L Kelly; M A Corrigan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  The System for Patient Assessment of Cancer Experiences (SPACE): a cross-sectional study examining feasibility and acceptability.

Authors:  Rob W Sanson-Fisher; Breanne T Hobden; Mariko L Carey; Heidi E Turon; Amy E Waller; Anthony M Proietto
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  In-clinic use of electronic pain diaries: barriers of implementation among pain physicians.

Authors:  Lisa D Marceau; Carol L Link; Lauren D Smith; Sarah J Carolan; Robert N Jamison
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Personal digital assistant data capture: the future of quality of life measurement in prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Andrew G Matthew; Kristen L Currie; Paul Ritvo; Robert Nam; Michael E Nesbitt; Robin W Kalnin; John Trachtenberg
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Are we reluctant to share our experiences through E-mail and still love postal survey?

Authors:  Ashok Jadon
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-01

8.  Acceptability of a Touch Screen Tablet Psychosocial Survey Administered to Radiation Therapy Patients in Japan.

Authors:  Eiji Suzuki; Lisa Mackenzie; Robert Sanson-Fisher; Mariko Carey; Catherine D'Este; Hiromi Asada; Masakazu Toi
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2016-08

9.  Real-time electronic patient evaluation of lymphedema symptoms, referral, and satisfaction: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jennifer L Nahum; Mei R Fu; Joan Scagliola; Martha Rodorigo; Sandy Tobik; Amber Guth; Deborah Axelrod
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2021-04-20

10.  Feasibility and acceptance of electronic quality of life assessment in general practice: an implementation study.

Authors:  Anja Rogausch; Jörg Sigle; Anna Seibert; Sabine Thüring; Michael M Kochen; Wolfgang Himmel
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.