| Literature DB >> 26622919 |
Michael J Stirratt1, Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob2, Heidi M Crane3, Jane M Simoni4, Susan Czajkowski5, Marisa E Hilliard6, James E Aikens7, Christine M Hunter8, Dawn I Velligan9, Kristen Huntley10, Gbenga Ogedegbe11, Cynthia S Rand12, Eleanor Schron13, Wendy J Nilsen14.
Abstract
Medication adherence plays an important role in optimizing the outcomes of many treatment and preventive regimens in chronic illness. Self-report is the most common method for assessing adherence behavior in research and clinical care, but there are questions about its validity and precision. The NIH Adherence Network assembled a panel of adherence research experts working across various chronic illnesses to review self-report medication adherence measures and research on their validity. Self-report medication adherence measures vary substantially in their question phrasing, recall periods, and response items. Self-reports tend to overestimate adherence behavior compared with other assessment methods and generally have high specificity but low sensitivity. Most evidence indicates that self-report adherence measures show moderate correspondence to other adherence measures and can significantly predict clinical outcomes. The quality of self-report adherence measures may be enhanced through efforts to use validated scales, assess the proper construct, improve estimation, facilitate recall, reduce social desirability bias, and employ technologic delivery. Self-report medication adherence measures can provide actionable information despite their limitations. They are preferred when speed, efficiency, and low-cost measures are required, as is often the case in clinical care.Entities:
Keywords: Adherence; Compliance; Medication; Self-management; Self-report
Year: 2015 PMID: 26622919 PMCID: PMC4656225 DOI: 10.1007/s13142-015-0315-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Behav Med ISSN: 1613-9860 Impact factor: 3.046