Literature DB >> 16360068

Fluoroscopically guided implantation of modern cardiac resynchronization devices: radiation burden to the patient and associated risks.

Kostas Perisinakis1, Nicholas Theocharopoulos, John Damilakis, Emmanouel Manios, Panayiotis Vardas, Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To establish radiation risks for patients undergoing fluoroscopically guided cardiac resynchronization device implantation.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchonization therapy (CRT) may be associated with extended fluoroscopic exposure.
METHODS: The fluoroscopy time, dose-area product (DAP), exposure parameters, and percentage contribution of the fluoroscopic projections commonly used were recorded in a series of 14 consecutive patients referred for cardiac resynchronization device implantation and compared to corresponding data obtained from a control group of 20 patients who underwent a conventional rhythm device implantation operation. The DAP to peak skin dose, DAP to effective dose, and DAP to gonadal dose conversion factors were determined for biventricular pacing and conventional rhythm device implantation using a humanoid phantom and thermoluminescence dosimetry.
RESULTS: The mean total fluoroscopy time and DAP values were 35.2 min and 4,765 cGy cm2, respectively, for biventricular pacing and 8.2 min and 1,106 cGy cm2, respectively, for conventional rhythm device implantation. Patient skin dose from biventricular pacing procedures requiring extended fluoroscopic exposure may exceed threshold dose for the induction of skin effects only if X-ray source-to-skin distance is kept low. The risk values for fatal cancer and severe hereditary disorders, respectively, associated with a typical CRT procedure were 273 per million and 0.2 per million treated patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Radiation risks associated with fluoroscopically guided CRT procedures may be considerable. Present data may be used for the estimation of patient radiation risks from CRT procedures performed in other institutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16360068     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  14 in total

1.  First in vivo use of a capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducer array-based imaging and ablation catheter.

Authors:  Douglas N Stephens; Uyen T Truong; Amin Nikoozadeh; Omer Oralkan; Chi Hyung Seo; Jonathan Cannata; Aaron Dentinger; Kai Thomenius; Alan de la Rama; Tho Nguyen; Feng Lin; Pierre Khuri-Yakub; Aman Mahajan; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Matt O'Donnell; David J Sahn
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 2.  Exposing the thyroid to radiation: a review of its current extent, risks, and implications.

Authors:  Bridget Sinnott; Elaine Ron; Arthur B Schneider
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 19.871

3.  Reference levels and patient doses in interventional cardiology procedures in Greece.

Authors:  George Simantirakis; Christina Koukorava; Maria Kalathaki; Christos Pafilis; Ioannis Kaisas; Sotirios Economides; Costas J Hourdakis; Vassiliki Kamenopoulou; Evaggelos Georgiou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac imaging procedures: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Jersey Chen; Andrew J Einstein; Reza Fazel; Harlan M Krumholz; Yongfei Wang; Joseph S Ross; Henry H Ting; Nilay D Shah; Khurram Nasir; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  MR cine DENSE dyssynchrony parameters for the evaluation of heart failure: comparison with myocardial tissue tagging.

Authors:  Loren P Budge; Adam S Helms; Michael Salerno; Christopher M Kramer; Frederick H Epstein; Kenneth C Bilchick
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-08

6.  Surgically placed left ventricular leads provide similar outcomes to percutaneous leads in patients with failed coronary sinus lead placement.

Authors:  Gorav Ailawadi; Damien J Lapar; Brian R Swenson; Cory D Maxwell; Micah E Girotti; James D Bergin; John A Kern; John P Dimarco; Srijoy Mahapatra
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  Cancer risk related to low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging in patients after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mark J Eisenberg; Jonathan Afilalo; Patrick R Lawler; Michal Abrahamowicz; Hugues Richard; Louise Pilote
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Multifunctional catheters combining intracardiac ultrasound imaging and electrophysiology sensing.

Authors:  D N Stephens; J Cannata; Ruibin Liu; Jian Zhong Zhao; K K Shung; Hien Nguyen; R Chia; A Dentinger; D Wildes; K E Thomenius; A Mahajan; K Shivkumar; Kang Kim; M O'Donnell; A Nikoozadeh; O Oralkan; P T Khuri-Yakub; D J Sahn
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures.

Authors:  Reza Fazel; Harlan M Krumholz; Yongfei Wang; Joseph S Ross; Jersey Chen; Henry H Ting; Nilay D Shah; Khurram Nasir; Andrew J Einstein; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Retrospective study of patients radiation dose during cardiac catheterization procedures.

Authors:  Beverley Osei; Lu Xu; Amanda Johnston; Sara Darko; Johnson Darko; Ernest Osei
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.