Literature DB >> 23265414

A mathematical model for analyzing the elasticity, viscosity, and failure of soft tissue: comparison of native and decellularized porcine cardiac extracellular matrix for tissue engineering.

Tomer Bronshtein1, Gigi Chi Ting Au-Yeung, Udi Sarig, Evelyne Bao-Vi Nguyen, Priyadarshini S Mhaisalkar, Freddy Yin Chiang Boey, Subbu S Venkatraman, Marcelle Machluf.   

Abstract

The clinical success of tissue-engineered constructs commonly requires mechanical properties that closely mimic those of the human tissue. Determining the viscoelastic properties of such biomaterials and the factors governing their failure profiles, however, has proven challenging, although collecting extensive data regarding their tensile behavior is straightforward. The easily calculated Young's modulus remains the most reported mechanical measure, regardless of its limitations, even though single-relaxation-time (SRT) models can provide much more information, which remain scarce due to a lack of manageable tools for implementing these models. We developed an easy-to-use algorithm for applying the Zener SRT model and determining the elastic moduli, viscosity, and failure profiles of materials under different mechanical tests in a user-independent manner. The algorithm was validated on the data resulting from tensile tests on native and decellularized porcine cardiac tissue, previously suggested as a promising scaffold material for cardiac tissue engineering. This analysis yields new and more accurate measurements such as the elastic moduli and viscosity, the model's relaxation time, and information on the factors governing the materials' failure profiles. These measurements indicate that the viscoelasticity and strength of the decellularized acellular extracellular matrix (ECM) are similar to those of native tissue, although its elasticity and apparent viscosity are higher. Nonetheless, reseeding and culturing the ECM with mesenchymal stem cells was shown to partially restore the mechanical properties lost after decellularization. We propose this algorithm as a platform for soft-tissue analysis that can provide comparable and unbiased measures for characterizing viscoelastic biomaterials commonly used in tissue engineering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23265414      PMCID: PMC3689938          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2012.0387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods        ISSN: 1937-3384            Impact factor:   3.056


  53 in total

Review 1.  Advanced tools for tissue engineering: scaffolds, bioreactors, and signaling.

Authors:  Lisa E Freed; Farshid Guilak; X Edward Guo; Martha L Gray; Robert Tranquillo; Jeffrey W Holmes; Milica Radisic; Michael V Sefton; David Kaplan; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2006-12

Review 2.  Challenges in cardiac tissue engineering.

Authors:  Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic; Nina Tandon; Amandine Godier; Robert Maidhof; Anna Marsano; Timothy P Martens; Milica Radisic
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 3.  Intrinsic extracellular matrix properties regulate stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Gwendolen C Reilly; Adam J Engler
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Engineering cell platforms for myocardial regeneration.

Authors:  Udi Sarig; Marcelle Machluf
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 4.388

5.  Linear and nonlinear viscoelastic modeling of aorta and carotid pressure-area dynamics under in vivo and ex vivo conditions.

Authors:  Daniela Valdez-Jasso; Daniel Bia; Yanina Zócalo; Ricardo L Armentano; Mansoor A Haider; Mette S Olufsen
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Viscoelastic properties of bovine orbital connective tissue and fat: constitutive models.

Authors:  Lawrence Yoo; Vijay Gupta; Choongyeop Lee; Pirouz Kavehpore; Joseph L Demer
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2011-01-05

7.  Mechanical testing of human cardiac tissue: some implications for MRI safety.

Authors:  Maria-Benedicta Edwards; Edward R C Draper; Jeffrey W Hand; Kenneth M Taylor; Ian R Young
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Mechanical properties and in vivo behavior of a biodegradable synthetic polymer microfiber-extracellular matrix hydrogel biohybrid scaffold.

Authors:  Yi Hong; Alexander Huber; Keisuke Takanari; Nicholas J Amoroso; Ryotaro Hashizume; Stephen F Badylak; William R Wagner
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Aging impact on brain biomechanics with applications to hydrocephalus.

Authors:  K P Wilkie; C S Drapaca; S Sivaloganathan
Journal:  Math Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 10.  Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Transpl Immunol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.708

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Materials for Cardiac Repair and Regeneration.

Authors:  Donald Bejleri; Michael E Davis
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 9.933

2.  Gelatin Promotes Cell Retention Within Decellularized Heart Extracellular Matrix Vasculature and Parenchyma.

Authors:  Karis R Tang-Quan; Yutao Xi; Camila Hochman-Mendez; Qian Xiang; Po-Feng Lee; Luiz C Sampaio; Doris A Taylor
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.321

3.  Pushing the envelope in tissue engineering: ex vivo production of thick vascularized cardiac extracellular matrix constructs.

Authors:  Udi Sarig; Evelyne Bao-Vi Nguyen; Yao Wang; Sherwin Ting; Tomer Bronshtein; Hadar Sarig; Nitsan Dahan; Maskit Gvirtz; Shaul Reuveny; Steve K W Oh; Thomas Scheper; Yin Chiang Freddy Boey; Subbu S Venkatraman; Marcelle Machluf
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  An alternative approach to decellularize whole porcine heart.

Authors:  Ketaki Methe; Henrik Bäckdahl; Bengt R Johansson; Nikhil Nayakawde; Goran Dellgren; Suchitra Sumitran-Holgersson
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2014-12-01

Review 5.  Optical coherence elastography in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Mitchell A Kirby; Ivan Pelivanov; Shaozhen Song; Łukasz Ambrozinski; Soon Joon Yoon; Liang Gao; David Li; Tueng T Shen; Ruikang K Wang; Matthew O'Donnell
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Biological and mechanical interplay at the Macro- and Microscales Modulates the Cell-Niche Fate.

Authors:  Udi Sarig; Hadar Sarig; Aleksander Gora; Muthu Kumar Krishnamoorthi; Gigi Chi Ting Au-Yeung; Elio de-Berardinis; Su Yin Chaw; Priyadarshini Mhaisalkar; Hanumakumar Bogireddi; Seeram Ramakrishna; Freddy Yin Chiang Boey; Subbu S Venkatraman; Marcelle Machluf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  In Vivo Performance of Decellularized Vascular Grafts: A Review Article.

Authors:  Chih-Hsun Lin; Kai Hsia; Hsu Ma; Hsinyu Lee; Jen-Her Lu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.