Eric L Pierce1, Andrew W Siefert1, Deborah M Paul1, Sarah K Wells1, Charles H Bloodworth1, Satoshi Takebayashi2, Chikashi Aoki2, Morten O Jensen1, Matthew J Gillespie3, Robert C Gorman2, Joseph H Gorman2, Ajit P Yoganathan4. 1. The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 2. Gorman Cardiovascular Research Group, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Gorman Cardiovascular Research Group, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: ajit.yoganathan@bme.gatech.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Annuloplasty ring dehiscence is a well described mode of mitral valve repair failure. Defining the mechanisms underlying dehiscence may facilitate its prevention. METHODS: Factors that govern suture dehiscence were examined with an ovine model. After undersized ring annuloplasty in live animals (n = 5), cyclic force (FC) that acts on sutures during cardiac contraction was measured with custom transducers. FC was measured at ten suture positions, throughout cardiac cycles with peak left ventricular pressure (LVPmax) of 100, 125, and 150 mm Hg. Suture pullout testing was conducted on explanted mitral annuli (n = 12) to determine suture holding strength at each position. Finally, relative collagen density differences at suture sites around the annulus were assessed by two-photon excitation fluoroscopy. RESULTS: Anterior FC exceeded posterior FC at each LVPmax (eg, 2.8 ± 1.3 N versus 1.8 ± 1.2 N at LVPmax = 125 mm Hg, p < 0.01). Anterior holding strength exceeded posterior holding strength (6.4 ± 3.6 N versus 3.9 ± 1.6 N, p < 0.0001). On the basis of FC at LVPmax of 150 mm Hg, margin of safety before suture pullout was vastly higher between the trigones (exclusive) versus elsewhere (4.8 ± 0.9 N versus 1.9 ± 0.5 N, p < 0.001). Margin of safety exhibited strong correlation to collagen density (R(2) = 0.947). CONCLUSIONS: Despite lower cyclic loading on posterior sutures, the weaker posterior mitral annular tissue creates higher risk of dehiscence, apparently because of reduced collagen content. Sutures placed atop the trigones are less secure than predicted, because of a combination of reduced collagen and higher overall rigidity in this region. These findings highlight the inter-trigonal tissue as the superior anchor and have implications on the design and implantation techniques for next-generation mitral prostheses.
BACKGROUND: Annuloplasty ring dehiscence is a well described mode of mitral valve repair failure. Defining the mechanisms underlying dehiscence may facilitate its prevention. METHODS: Factors that govern suture dehiscence were examined with an ovine model. After undersized ring annuloplasty in live animals (n = 5), cyclic force (FC) that acts on sutures during cardiac contraction was measured with custom transducers. FC was measured at ten suture positions, throughout cardiac cycles with peak left ventricular pressure (LVPmax) of 100, 125, and 150 mm Hg. Suture pullout testing was conducted on explanted mitral annuli (n = 12) to determine suture holding strength at each position. Finally, relative collagen density differences at suture sites around the annulus were assessed by two-photon excitation fluoroscopy. RESULTS: Anterior FC exceeded posterior FC at each LVPmax (eg, 2.8 ± 1.3 N versus 1.8 ± 1.2 N at LVPmax = 125 mm Hg, p < 0.01). Anterior holding strength exceeded posterior holding strength (6.4 ± 3.6 N versus 3.9 ± 1.6 N, p < 0.0001). On the basis of FC at LVPmax of 150 mm Hg, margin of safety before suture pullout was vastly higher between the trigones (exclusive) versus elsewhere (4.8 ± 0.9 N versus 1.9 ± 0.5 N, p < 0.001). Margin of safety exhibited strong correlation to collagen density (R(2) = 0.947). CONCLUSIONS: Despite lower cyclic loading on posterior sutures, the weaker posterior mitral annular tissue creates higher risk of dehiscence, apparently because of reduced collagen content. Sutures placed atop the trigones are less secure than predicted, because of a combination of reduced collagen and higher overall rigidity in this region. These findings highlight the inter-trigonal tissue as the superior anchor and have implications on the design and implantation techniques for next-generation mitral prostheses.
Authors: Manuel K Rausch; Wolfgang Bothe; John-Peder Escobar Kvitting; Julia C Swanson; Neil B Ingels; D Craig Miller; Ellen Kuhl Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2011-02-19 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Maria-Benedicta Edwards; Edward R C Draper; Jeffrey W Hand; Kenneth M Taylor; Ian R Young Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2005 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: A M Gillinov; D M Cosgrove; B W Lytle; P C Taylor; R W Stewart; P M McCarthy; N G Smedira; D D Muehrcke; C Apperson-Hansen; F D Loop Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: W Randolph Chitwood; Evelio Rodriguez; Michael W A Chu; Ansar Hassan; T Bruce Ferguson; Paul W Vos; L Wiley Nifong Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Andrew W Siefert; Jean Pierre M Rabbah; Kevin J Koomalsingh; Steven A Touchton; Neelakantan Saikrishnan; Jeremy R McGarvey; Robert C Gorman; Joseph H Gorman; Ajit P Yoganathan Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Beatrice E Ncho; Eric L Pierce; Charles H Bloodworth; Akito Imai; Keitaro Okamoto; Yoshiaki Saito; Robert C Gorman; Joseph H Gorman; Ajit P Yoganathan Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2019-05-31 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Immanuel David Madukauwa-David; Eric L Pierce; Fatiesa Sulejmani; Joshua Pataky; Wei Sun; Ajit P Yoganathan Journal: Biomech Model Mechanobiol Date: 2018-10-04
Authors: Eric L Pierce; Keshav Kohli; Beatrice Ncho; Vahid Sadri; Charles H Bloodworth; Fiona E Mangan; Ajit P Yoganathan Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2018-10-17 Impact factor: 3.934