Literature DB >> 16348322

Digestion of barley, maize, and wheat by selected species of ruminal bacteria.

T A McAllister1, K J Cheng, L M Rode, C W Forsberg.   

Abstract

Differences in the digestion of barley, maize, and wheat by three major ruminal starch-digesting bacterial species, Streptococcus bovis 26, Ruminobacter amylophilus 50, and Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens A38, were characterized. The rate of starch digestion in all cereal species was greater for S. bovis 26 than for R. amylophilus 50 or B. fibrisolvens A38. Starch digestion by S. bovis 26 was greater in wheat than in barley or maize, whereas starch digestion by R. amylophilus 50 was greater in barley than in maize or wheat. B. fibrisolvens A38 digested the starch in barley and maize to a similar extent but was virtually unable to digest the starch in wheat. The higher ammonia concentration in cultures of B. fibrisolvens A38 when grown on wheat than when grown on barley or maize suggests that B. fibrisolvens A38 utilized wheat protein rather than starch. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that B. fibrisolvens A38 initially colonized cell wall material, while S. bovis 26 randomly colonized the endosperm and R. amylophilus 50 preferentially colonized starch granules. There was subsequent colonization but only superficial digestion of wheat starch granules by B. fibrisolvens A38. Variation in the association between starch and protein within the endosperm of cereal grains contributes to the differential effectiveness with which amylolytic species can utilize cereal starch.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 16348322      PMCID: PMC184913          DOI: 10.1128/aem.56.10.3146-3153.1990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  16 in total

1.  A Study of Bacterial Species from the Rumen Which Produce Ammonia from Protein Hydrolyzate.

Authors:  H A Bladen; M P Bryant; R N Doetsch
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1961-03

2.  The anaerobic mesophilic cellulolytic bacteria.

Authors:  R E HUNGATE
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1950-03

3.  The nitrogen sources of Bacteroides amylophilus.

Authors:  P N Hobson; E I McDougall; R Summers
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1968-03

4.  Protein degradation by ruminal microorganisms from sheep fed dietary supplements of urea, casein, or albumin.

Authors:  R J Wallace; G A Broderick; M L Brammall
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Influence of acidosis on rumen function.

Authors:  L L Slyter
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  THE CELL-BOUND ALPHA-AMYLASES OF STREPTOCOCCUS BOVIS.

Authors:  G J WALKER
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1965-02       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  Degradation of protein by mixed cultures of rumen bacteria: identification of Streptococcus bovis as an actively proteolytic rumen bacterium.

Authors:  J B Russell; W G Bottje; M A Cotta
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Effect of pH on the efficiency of growth by pure cultures of rumen bacteria in continuous culture.

Authors:  J B Russell; D B Dombrowski
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Amylolytic activity of selected species of ruminal bacteria.

Authors:  M A Cotta
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Compositions and characteristics of strains of Streptococcus bovis.

Authors:  J B Russell; P H Robinson
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 4.034

View more
  7 in total

1.  Isolation and overexpression of a gene encoding an extracellular beta-(1,3-1,4)-glucanase from Streptococcus bovis JB1.

Authors:  M S Ekinci; S I McCrae; H J Flint
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Glucose transport by mixed ruminal bacteria from a cow.

Authors:  H Kajikawa; M Amari; S Masaki
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Quantitative qPCR Analysis of Ruminal Microorganisms in Beef Cattle Grazing in Pastures in the Rainy Season and Supplemented with Different Protein Levels.

Authors:  Renata Pereira da Silva-Marques; Joanis Tilemahos Zervoudakis; Luciano Nakazato; Luciano da Silva Cabral; Luciana Keiko Hatamoto-Zervoudakis; Maria Isabel Leite da Silva; Núbia Bezerra do Nascimento Matos; Letícia Camara Pitchenin
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Activity and cellular localization of amylases of rabbit cecal bacteria.

Authors:  K Sirotek; M Marounek; O Suchorská
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.099

Review 5.  Ruminal acidosis, bacterial changes, and lipopolysaccharides.

Authors:  Hugo F Monteiro; Antonio P Faciola
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Regulation of CcpA on the growth and organic acid production characteristics of ruminal Streptococcus bovis at different pH.

Authors:  Yaqian Jin; Chao Wang; Yaotian Fan; Mawda Elmhadi; Ying Zhang; Hongrong Wang
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.605

7.  Effect of Dietary Starch Source and Concentration on Equine Fecal Microbiota.

Authors:  Brittany E Harlow; Laurie M Lawrence; Susan H Hayes; Andrea Crum; Michael D Flythe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.