Literature DB >> 16343130

Recognition performance and perceived quality of video enhanced for the visually impaired.

Eli Peli1.   

Abstract

Subjects with central field loss (CFL) individually selected enhancement parameters to improve visibility of static video images. The effect of enhancement on performance and on perceived quality of motion video was assessed. Performance, e.g. recognition of visual details, was assessed by having subjects answer questions regarding visual information contained in the video motion segments that were enhanced using the individually-selected parameters. Enhancement did not improve subject performance on questions about video content. This result might be due to a ceiling effect limitation of the performance assessment method. In a second procedure, subjects' continuous perceptions of quality (using an adjective-based rating scale) were made while the enhancement parameters were abruptly switched among multiple values; these included the individually-selected enhancements, as well as unenhanced, over-enhanced, and degraded segments. The results indicate that adaptive enhancement (individually-tuned using a static image) adds significantly to perceived image quality when viewing motion video. Subjects who selected stronger contrast enhancement also perceived the enhancement to provide a larger benefit in image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16343130      PMCID: PMC1343473          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00340.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  11 in total

1.  Neural adjustments to image blur.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Mark A Georgeson; Shernaaz M Webster
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Continuous assessment of perceptual image quality.

Authors:  R Hamberg; H de Ridder
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Filling-in of retinal scotomas.

Authors:  Dror Zur; Shimon Ullman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Enhancement of text for the visually impaired.

Authors:  E M Fine; E Peli
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Image enhancement for the visually impaired: the effects of enhancement on face recognition.

Authors:  E Peli; E Lee; C L Trempe; S Buzney
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Image enhancement in the JPEG domain for people with vision impairment.

Authors:  Jinshan Tang; Jeonghoon Kim; Eli Peli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Wideband enhancement of television images for people with visual impairments.

Authors:  Eli Peli; Jeonghoon Kim; Yitzhak Yitzhaky; Robert B Goldstein; Russell L Woods
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Image enhancement filters significantly improve reading performance for low vision observers.

Authors:  T B Lawton
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 10.  Limitations of image enhancement for the visually impaired.

Authors:  E Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  High Tech Aids Low Vision: A Review of Image Processing for the Visually Impaired.

Authors:  Howard Moshtael; Tariq Aslam; Ian Underwood; Baljean Dhillon
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.283

2.  Post Transmission Digital Video Enhancement for People with Visual Impairments.

Authors:  Matthew Fullerton; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Soc Inf Disp       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.140

3.  Visual search with image modification in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Emily Wiecek; Mary Lou Jackson; Steven C Dakin; Peter Bex
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Television, computer and portable display device use by people with central vision impairment.

Authors:  Russell L Woods; Premnandhini Satgunam
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  The impact of a video intervention on the use of low vision assistive devices.

Authors:  Robert B Goldstein; Elizabeth Dugan; Felicia Trachtenberg; Eli Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Learning building layouts with non-geometric visual information: the effects of visual impairment and age.

Authors:  Amy A Kalia; Gordon E Legge; Nicholas A Giudice
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Designing and testing scene enhancement algorithms for patients with retina degenerative disorders.

Authors:  Walid I Al-Atabany; Muhammad A Memon; Susan M Downes; Patrick A Degenaar
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Effects of contour enhancement on low-vision preference and visual search.

Authors:  Premnandhini Satgunam; Russell L Woods; Gang Luo; P Matthew Bronstad; Zachary Reynolds; Chaithanya Ramachandra; Bartlett W Mel; Eli Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  An augmented-reality edge enhancement application for Google Glass.

Authors:  Alex D Hwang; Eli Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Digital Enhancement of Television Signals for People with Visual Impairments: Evaluation of a Consumer Product.

Authors:  Matthew Fullerton; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Soc Inf Disp       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.