Literature DB >> 17435527

The impact of a video intervention on the use of low vision assistive devices.

Robert B Goldstein1, Elizabeth Dugan, Felicia Trachtenberg, Eli Peli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: An image-enhanced educational and motivational video was developed for patients with low vision and their caretakers. Impact on knowledge, self-efficacy, and attitudes was assessed.
METHODS: The video incorporated cognitive restructuring to change emotional response; a "virtual home"; a veridical simulation of vision with age-related macular degeneration and contrast enhancement of the video. Subjects (median age 77.5) were randomized into control (n=79) and intervention (n=75) groups. Telephone interviews were at baseline, 2 weeks and 3 months. Main outcome measures were: knowledge (eight questions), self-efficacy score (seven questions), adaptive behaviors (10 questions), willingness to use devices, and emotional response (4-point scales).
RESULTS: The intervention group showed a statistically significant improvement in knowledge, (difference of 1.1 out of eight questions, p<0.001). Change in use of books-on-tape was more for the intervention group than for controls (p=0.005). The intervention group increased use of books-on-tape from 28 to 51% whereas the control group did not (34% at both times). However, there was no significant change in the use of other assistive devices, including magnifiers. Both groups increased adaptive behaviors. There was no significant difference in change of self-efficacy score or in emotional affect between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The video had a small, but statistically significant impact on knowledge and willingness to use assistive devices. There was little impact on adaptive behaviors and emotional affect. The minimal changes in outcome were disappointing, but this does not minimize the importance of patient education; it just emphasizes how hard it is to effect change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17435527      PMCID: PMC1858638          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3180339a03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  29 in total

1.  Image enhancement for the visually impaired. Simulations and experimental results.

Authors:  E Peli; R B Goldstein; G M Young; C L Trempe; S M Buzney
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Ophthalmic knowledge and beliefs among women with diabetes.

Authors:  A Pasagian-Macaulay; C E Basch; P Zybert; J Wylie-Rosett
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.140

3.  Knowledge and beliefs about common eye diseases.

Authors:  K Attebo; P Mitchell; R Cumming; W Smith
Journal:  Aust N Z J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-11

4.  The cause-specific prevalence of visual impairment in an urban population. The Baltimore Eye Survey.

Authors:  B Rahmani; J M Tielsch; J Katz; J Gottsch; H Quigley; J Javitt; A Sommer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States.

Authors:  David S Friedman; Benita J O'Colmain; Beatriz Muñoz; Sandra C Tomany; Cathy McCarty; Paulus T V M de Jong; Barbara Nemesure; Paul Mitchell; John Kempen
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04

6.  Double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of lutein and antioxidant supplementation in the intervention of atrophic age-related macular degeneration: the Veterans LAST study (Lutein Antioxidant Supplementation Trial).

Authors:  Stuart Richer; William Stiles; Laisvyde Statkute; Jose Pulido; James Frankowski; David Rudy; Kevin Pei; Michael Tsipursky; Jill Nyland
Journal:  Optometry       Date:  2004-04

Review 7.  Preventing blindness in Americans: the need for eye health education.

Authors:  J C Javitt
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

8.  Improving memory and control beliefs through cognitive restructuring and self-generated strategies.

Authors:  M E Lachman; S L Weaver; M Bandura; E Elliott; C J Lewkowicz
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1992-09

9.  Barriers to accessing low vision services.

Authors:  Tamara L Pollard; John A Simpson; Ecosse L Lamoureux; Jill E Keeffe
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Preventing and managing visual disability in primary care: clinical applications.

Authors:  Caroline L Goldzweig; Susannah Rowe; Neil S Wenger; Catherine H MacLean; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  4 in total

1.  Low vision rehabilitation in improving the quality of life for patients with impaired vision: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 52 randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Jianhua Liu; Jige Dong; Yaping Chen; Weidong Zhang; Shuai Tong; Jiangzhou Guo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 1.889

2.  Personalized Telerehabilitation for a Head-mounted Low Vision Aid: A Randomized Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Marie-Céline Lorenzini; Walter Wittich
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults.

Authors:  Ruth Ma van Nispen; Gianni Virgili; Mirke Hoeben; Maaike Langelaan; Jeroen Klevering; Jan Ee Keunen; Ger Hmb van Rens
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-27

Review 4.  Watch this space: a systematic review of the use of video-based media as a patient education tool in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Reem Farwana; Adam Sheriff; Haider Manzar; Mohammad Farwana; Ammar Yusuf; Ibrahim Sheriff
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.775

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.