Literature DB >> 16341553

Density-dependent responses of fawn cohort body mass in two contrasting roe deer populations.

Petter Kjellander1, Jean-Michel Gaillard, A J Mark Hewison.   

Abstract

We investigated the influence of population density on juvenile body mass in two contrasting roe deer populations, in Sweden (Bogesund) and France (Chizé), in which density was monitored for >or=15 years. We investigated the effect of population density and climatic conditions on cohort performance. We predicted that: (1) body mass of growing fawns should be sensitive to environmental changes, showing marked between-year variation (i.e., cohort effects), (2) fawns in the less productive (weakly seasonal, weakly predictable summer weather) habitat of Chizé should show stronger density-dependent responses due to more severe food competition during summer than fawns in the more productive (markedly seasonal, moderately predictable summer weather) habitat of Bogesund, and (3) fawns at Bogesund should be heavier both in absolute terms and relative to their size than their conspecifics in Chizé due to a higher degree of fat accumulation in northern environments. In both study sites we found marked cohort variation and clear effects of density, with body mass varying by as much as 29% over years. While neither summer nor winter climate influenced fawn body mass at Bogesund, fawns tended to be lighter after summers with high temperatures at Chizé. In addition, fawns were heavier after acorn mast years experienced in utero at Bogesund. As expected, the strength of the density-dependent response of fawn body mass was greater at Chizé than at Bogesund. For a given density, male fawns were consistently heavier than females in both sites. Lastly, both sexes at Bogesund had higher absolute body mass and were larger for a given body size than in Chizé. Our results clearly demonstrate that absolute density is a poor predictor of roe deer performance and supports the view that habitat quality has an overwhelming importance for determining fawn body mass in roe deer populations.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16341553     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0188-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  16 in total

1.  Early development and fitness in birds and mammals.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Body mass and individual fitness in female ungulates: bigger is not always better.

Authors:  J M Gaillard; M Festa-Bianchet; D Delorme; J Jorgenson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Variations in adult body mass in roe deer: the effects of population density at birth and of habitat quality.

Authors:  Nathalie Pettorelli; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Guy Van Laere; Patrick Duncan; Petter Kjellander; Olof Liberg; Daniel Delorme; Daniel Maillard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Age, sex, density, winter weather, and population crashes in Soay sheep.

Authors:  T Coulson; E A Catchpole; S D Albon; B J Morgan; J M Pemberton; T H Clutton-Brock; M J Crawley; B T Grenfell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-05-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  How much variance is explained by ecologists? Additional perspectives.

Authors:  Michael S Peek; A Joshua Leffler; Stephan D Flint; Ronald J Ryel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-06-28       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Spatial variation in springtime food resources influences the winter body mass of roe deer fawns.

Authors:  Nathalie Pettorelli; Stephane Dray; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Daniel Chessel; Patrick Duncan; Andrew Illius; Nadine Guillon; Francois Klein; Guy Van Laere
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Environmental stochasticity and population dynamics of large herbivores: a search for mechanisms.

Authors:  B E Sæther
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  The effects of density dependent resource limitation on size of wild reindeer.

Authors:  Terje Skogland
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Population density and small-scale variation in habitat quality affect phenotypic quality in roe deer.

Authors:  Nathalie Pettorelli; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Patrick Duncan; Jean-Pierre Ouellet; Guy Van Laere
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-05-03       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Cohort variation in male survival and lifetime breeding success in red deer.

Authors:  K E Rose; T H Clutton-Brock; F E Guinness
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.091

View more
  12 in total

1.  Reproductive allocation in pulsed-resource environments: a comparative study in two populations of wild boar.

Authors:  Marlène Gamelon; Stefano Focardi; Eric Baubet; Serge Brandt; Barbara Franzetti; Francesca Ronchi; Samuel Venner; Bernt-Erik Sæther; Jean-Michel Gaillard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Population density and sex do not influence fine-scale natal dispersal in roe deer.

Authors:  J-M Gaillard; A J M Hewison; P Kjellander; N Pettorelli; C Bonenfant; B Van Moorter; O Liberg; H Andren; G Van Laere; F Klein; J-M Angibault; A Coulon; C Vanpé
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Landscape fragmentation generates spatial variation of diet composition and quality in a generalist herbivore.

Authors:  Frial Abbas; Nicolas Morellet; A J Mark Hewison; Joël Merlet; Bruno Cargnelutti; Bruno Lourtet; Jean-Marc Angibault; Tanguy Daufresne; Stéphane Aulagnier; Hélène Verheyden
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Parturition date for a given female is highly repeatable within five roe deer populations.

Authors:  Floriane Plard; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Christophe Bonenfant; A J Mark Hewison; Daniel Delorme; Bruno Cargnelutti; Petter Kjellander; Erlend B Nilsen; Tim Coulson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  High red deer density depresses body mass of roe deer fawns.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Richard; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Sonia Saïd; Jean-Luc Hamann; François Klein
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Sex differences in condition dependence of natal dispersal in a large herbivore: dispersal propensity and distance are decoupled.

Authors:  A J M Hewison; J-M Gaillard; N Morellet; F Cagnacci; L Debeffe; B Cargnelutti; B Gehr; M Kröschel; M Heurich; A Coulon; P Kjellander; L Börger; S Focardi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Large impact of Eurasian lynx predation on roe deer population dynamics.

Authors:  Henrik Andrén; Olof Liberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Molecular detection of Babesia capreoli and Babesia venatorum in wild Swedish roe deer, Capreolus capreolus.

Authors:  Martin O Andersson; Ulrika A Bergvall; Jan Chirico; Madeleine Christensson; Per-Eric Lindgren; Jonas Nordström; Petter Kjellander
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Between-population differences in the genetic and maternal components of body mass in roe deer.

Authors:  E Quéméré; J M Gaillard; M Galan; C Vanpé; I David; M Pellerin; P Kjellander; A J M Hewison; J M Pemberton
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Spatial heterogeneity in the carrying capacity of sika deer in Japan.

Authors:  Hayato Iijima; Mayumi Ueno
Journal:  J Mammal       Date:  2016-01-31       Impact factor: 2.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.