Literature DB >> 11934368

Variations in adult body mass in roe deer: the effects of population density at birth and of habitat quality.

Nathalie Pettorelli1, Jean-Michel Gaillard, Guy Van Laere, Patrick Duncan, Petter Kjellander, Olof Liberg, Daniel Delorme, Daniel Maillard.   

Abstract

Body mass is a key determinant of fitness components in many organisms, and adult mass varies considerably among individuals within populations. These variations have several causes, involve temporal and spatial factors, and are not yet well understood. We use long-term data from 20 roe deer cohorts (1977-96) in a 2600 ha study area (Chizé, western France) with two habitats contrasting in quality (rich oak forest in the North versus poor beech forest in the South) to analyse the effects of both cohort and habitat quality on adult mass (i.e. median body mass between 4 and 10 years of age) of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Cohort strongly influenced the adult body mass of roe deer in both sexes: males born in 1994 were 5.2 kg heavier when aged between 4 and 10 years old than males born in 1986, while females born in 1995 were 4.7 kg heavier between 4 and 10 years old than females born in 1982. For a given cohort, adult males were, on average, 0.9 kg heavier in the rich oak forest than in the poor beech forest. A similar trend occurred for adult females (0.5 kg heavier in the oak forest). The effects of cohort and habitat were additive and accounted for ca. 40% of the variation observed in the adult mass of roe deer at Chizé (males: 41.2%; females: 40.2%). Population density during the spring of the birth accounted for about 35% of cohort variation, whereas rainfall in May-June had no effect. Such delayed effects of density at birth on adult body mass probably affect population dynamics, and might constitute a mechanism by which delayed density-dependence occurs in ungulate populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11934368      PMCID: PMC1690952          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  5 in total

1.  Early development and fitness in birds and mammals.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Body mass and individual fitness in female ungulates: bigger is not always better.

Authors:  J M Gaillard; M Festa-Bianchet; D Delorme; J Jorgenson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Population dynamics of Norwegian red deer: density-dependence and climatic variation.

Authors:  M C Forchhammer; N C Stenseth; E Post; R Langvatn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Early determinants of lifetime reproductive success differ between the sexes in red deer.

Authors:  L E Kruuk; T H Clutton-Brock; K E Rose; F E Guinness
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Global climate change and phenotypic variation among red deer cohorts.

Authors:  E Post; N C Stenseth; R Langvatn; J M Fromentin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

  5 in total
  31 in total

1.  Spatial variation in springtime food resources influences the winter body mass of roe deer fawns.

Authors:  Nathalie Pettorelli; Stephane Dray; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Daniel Chessel; Patrick Duncan; Andrew Illius; Nadine Guillon; Francois Klein; Guy Van Laere
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Experimental evidence for density-dependence of home-range size in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.): a comparison of two long-term studies.

Authors:  P Kjellander; A J M Hewison; O Liberg; J-M Angibault; E Bideau; B Cargnelutti
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Effects of density, climate, and supplementary forage on body mass and pregnancy rates of female red deer in Spain.

Authors:  P Rodriguez-Hidalgo; C Gortazar; F S Tortosa; C Rodriguez-Vigal; Y Fierro; J Vicente
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Density-dependent effects on physical condition and reproduction in North American elk: an experimental test.

Authors:  Kelley M Stewart; R Terry Bowyer; Brian L Dick; Bruce K Johnson; John G Kie
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Density-dependent responses of fawn cohort body mass in two contrasting roe deer populations.

Authors:  Petter Kjellander; Jean-Michel Gaillard; A J Mark Hewison
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Lack of compensatory body growth in a high performance moose Alces alces population.

Authors:  Erling J Solberg; Mathieu Garel; Morten Heim; Vidar Grøtan; Bernt-Erik Saether
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Lynx body size in Norway is related to its main prey (Roe deer) density, climate, and latitude.

Authors:  Yoram Yom-Tov; Tor Kvam; Øystein Wiig
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.129

8.  Population density and phenotypic attributes influence the level of nematode parasitism in roe deer.

Authors:  Guillaume Body; Hubert Ferté; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Daniel Delorme; François Klein; Emmanuelle Gilot-Fromont
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  Adaptation and habitat selection in the eco-evolutionary process.

Authors:  Douglas W Morris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Annual variation in maternal age and calving date generate cohort effects in moose (Alces alces) body mass.

Authors:  Erling J Solberg; Morten Heim; Vidar Grøtan; Bernt-Erik Saether; Mathieu Garel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.