Literature DB >> 10737404

Body mass and individual fitness in female ungulates: bigger is not always better.

J M Gaillard1, M Festa-Bianchet, D Delorme, J Jorgenson.   

Abstract

In female vertebrates, differences in fitness often correspond to differences in phenotypic quality, suggesting that larger females have greater fitness. Variation in individual fitness can result from variation in life span and/or variation in yearly reproductive success, but no study has yet assessed the relationships between the components of fitness and phenotypic quality while controlling for life span. We tried to fill this gap using data from long-term monitoring (23 years) of marked roe deer and bighorn sheep, two ungulates with very different life histories. In both species, we found a strong positive relationship between an adult female's mass and her probability of reaching old age: over the long term, bigger is indeed better for ungulate females. On the other hand, we found no evidence in either species that heavier females had higher fitness when differences in life span were accounted for: over the short term, bigger is not necessarily better. Our results indicate that, while broad differences in phenotypic quality affect individual fitness, when differences in life span are accounted for phenotypic quality has no residual effect on fitness. Therefore, within a given range of phenotypic quality, bigger is not always better, for reasons which may differ between species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10737404      PMCID: PMC1690550          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  2 in total

1.  Global climate change and phenotypic variation among red deer cohorts.

Authors:  E Post; N C Stenseth; R Langvatn; J M Fromentin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Natural selection on age-specific fertilities in human females: comparison of individual-level fitness measures.

Authors:  P Käär; J Jokela
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

  2 in total
  44 in total

1.  Variations in adult body mass in roe deer: the effects of population density at birth and of habitat quality.

Authors:  Nathalie Pettorelli; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Guy Van Laere; Patrick Duncan; Petter Kjellander; Olof Liberg; Daniel Delorme; Daniel Maillard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Effects of density, climate, and supplementary forage on body mass and pregnancy rates of female red deer in Spain.

Authors:  P Rodriguez-Hidalgo; C Gortazar; F S Tortosa; C Rodriguez-Vigal; Y Fierro; J Vicente
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Predation risk and longevity influence variation in fitness of female roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.).

Authors:  Petter Kjellander; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Mark Hewison; Olof Liberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Density-dependent responses of fawn cohort body mass in two contrasting roe deer populations.

Authors:  Petter Kjellander; Jean-Michel Gaillard; A J Mark Hewison
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Good reindeer mothers live longer and become better in raising offspring.

Authors:  Robert B Weladji; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Nigel G Yoccoz; Oystein Holand; Atle Mysterud; Anne Loison; Mauri Nieminen; Nils Chr Stenseth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Phenotypic determinants of individual fitness in female fur seals: larger is better.

Authors:  Gwénaël Beauplet; Christophe Guinet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Lack of compensatory body growth in a high performance moose Alces alces population.

Authors:  Erling J Solberg; Mathieu Garel; Morten Heim; Vidar Grøtan; Bernt-Erik Saether
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Sex ratio variation and mixed pairs in roe deer: evidence for control of sex allocation?

Authors:  David W Macdonald; Paul J Johnson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Annual variation in maternal age and calving date generate cohort effects in moose (Alces alces) body mass.

Authors:  Erling J Solberg; Morten Heim; Vidar Grøtan; Bernt-Erik Saether; Mathieu Garel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 10.  Functional genomic insights into the environmental determinants of mammalian fitness.

Authors:  Noah Snyder-Mackler; Amanda J Lea
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.578

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.