Literature DB >> 33715424

Sex differences in condition dependence of natal dispersal in a large herbivore: dispersal propensity and distance are decoupled.

A J M Hewison1, J-M Gaillard2, N Morellet1, F Cagnacci3, L Debeffe1, B Cargnelutti1, B Gehr4, M Kröschel5, M Heurich6, A Coulon7,8, P Kjellander9, L Börger10, S Focardi11.   

Abstract

Evolution should favour plasticity in dispersal decisions in response to spatial heterogeneity in social and environmental contexts. Sex differences in individual optimization of dispersal decisions are poorly documented in mammals, because species where both sexes commonly disperse are rare. To elucidate the sex-specific drivers governing dispersal, we investigated sex differences in condition dependence in the propensity and distance of natal dispersal in one such species, the roe deer, using fine-scale monitoring of 146 GPS-collared juveniles in an intensively monitored population in southwest France. Dispersal propensity increased with body mass in males such that 36% of light individuals dispersed, whereas 62% of heavy individuals did so, but there was no evidence for condition dependence in dispersal propensity among females. By contrast, dispersal distance increased with body mass at a similar rate in both sexes such that heavy dispersers travelled around twice as far as light dispersers. Sex differences in the strength of condition-dependent dispersal may result from different selection pressures acting on the behaviour of males and females. We suggest that females disperse prior to habitat saturation being reached, likely in relation to the risk of inbreeding. By contrast, natal dispersal in males is likely governed by competitive exclusion through male-male competition for breeding opportunities in this strongly territorial mammal. Our study is, to our knowledge, a first demonstration that condition dependence in dispersal propensity and dispersal distance may be decoupled, indicating contrasting selection pressures drive the behavioural decisions of whether or not to leave the natal range, and where to settle.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body mass; individual optimization; philopatry; roe deer

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33715424      PMCID: PMC7944087          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  35 in total

Review 1.  Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics.

Authors:  Diana E Bowler; Tim G Benton
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-05

2.  The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences.

Authors:  Jeremy M Davis; Judy A Stamps
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Antler size provides an honest signal of male phenotypic quality in roe deer.

Authors:  Cécile Vanpé; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Petter Kjellander; Atle Mysterud; Pauline Magnien; Daniel Delorme; Guy Van Laere; François Klein; Olof Liberg; A J Mark Hewison
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Dispersal is not female biased in a resource-defence mating ungulate, the European roe deer.

Authors:  A Coulon; J-F Cosson; N Morellet; J-M Angibault; B Cargnelutti; M Galan; S Aulagnier; A J M Hewison
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Population density and sex do not influence fine-scale natal dispersal in roe deer.

Authors:  J-M Gaillard; A J M Hewison; P Kjellander; N Pettorelli; C Bonenfant; B Van Moorter; O Liberg; H Andren; G Van Laere; F Klein; J-M Angibault; A Coulon; C Vanpé
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Early survival in roe deer: causes and consequences of cohort variation in two contrasted populations.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Gaillard; Jean-Marie Boutin; Daniel Delorme; Guy Van Laere; Patrick Duncan; Jean-Dominique Lebreton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Evolution driven by differential dispersal within a wild bird population.

Authors:  Dany Garant; Loeske E B Kruuk; Teddy A Wilkin; Robin H McCleery; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Selection against immigrants in wild seabird populations.

Authors:  Christophe Barbraud; Karine Delord
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 9.492

9.  Mother-offspring interactions affect natal dispersal in a lizard.

Authors:  Jean-François Le Galliard; Régis Ferrière; Jean Clobert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Negative density-dependent emigration of males in an increasing red deer population.

Authors:  Leif Egil Loe; Atle Mysterud; Vebjørn Veiberg; Rolf Langvatn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of environment and genotype on dispersal differ across departure, transfer and settlement in a butterfly metapopulation.

Authors:  Michelle F DiLeo; Etsuko Nonaka; Arild Husby; Marjo Saastamoinen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  Breeding site fidelity is lower in polygamous shorebirds and male-biased in monogamous species.

Authors:  Eunbi Kwon; Mihai Valcu; Margherita Cragnolini; Martin Bulla; Bruce Lyon; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.087

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.