Literature DB >> 16337330

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy--the experience of the German Laparoscopic Working Group.

Jens Rassweiler1, Jens Stolzenburg, Tullio Sulser, Serdar Deger, Jürgen Zumbé, Georg Hofmockel, Hubert John, Günther Janetschek, Jean-Luc Fehr, Martin Hatzinger, Michael Probst, Karl-Heinz Rothenberger, Vassilis Poulakis, Michael Truss, Gralf Popken, Jens Westphal, Uwe Alles, Paolo Fornara.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present the current status of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in Germany, Austria and Switzerland with respect to transferability, learning curve, and outcome.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of 5824 patients who underwent LRP in 18 centers by 50 urologists from March 1999 to August 2004 were analyzed retrospectively. Three centers performed more than 500, and six more than 250 cases. A transperitoneal descending technique with was used in 2701, a transperitoneal ascending in 1234, an extraperitoneal descending in 1814, and an extraperitoneal ascending modification in 75 cases. Specimen showed pT2 in 3535, pT3a in 1555, pT3b in 623, and pT4 in 111 cases.
RESULTS: Mean operating time averaged 211 (131-292) minutes, with shorter duration of the extraperitoneal descending technique. Conversion to open surgery averaged 2.4 (0-14.1) %. Re-intervention rate amounted to 2.7 (0.3-7.7) %. Complication rate averaged 8.9 (1.8-10.8) % including bleeding (0.3-2.5%) and rectal lesion (1.5-2.5%). The rate of positive margins was 10.6 (3.2-18) % for pT2- and 32.7 (20-38.5) % for pT3a-tumors Continence after 12 months was 84.9 (72-94) %. Data about potency (7 centers) revealed 52.5 (35-67) % full erections following bilateral nerve preservation. 5 year-PSA recurrence rate (3 centers) was 8.6 (4-15.3) % for pT2-tumors and 17.5 (15-20.6) % for pT3a-stages.
CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm the efficacy of the training program with safe transfer of LRP (i.e. low complication rate), however including all known problems of a retrospective study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16337330     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  25 in total

1.  Evaluation of 2,590 urological laparoscopic surgeries undertaken by urological surgeons accredited by an endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in urological laparoscopy in Japan.

Authors:  Tomonori Habuchi; Toshiro Terachi; Hiromitsu Mimata; Yukihiro Kondo; Hiroomi Kanayama; Tomohiko Ichikawa; Kikuo Nutahara; Tsuneharu Miki; Yoshinari Ono; Shiro Baba; Seiji Naito; Tadashi Matsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  [Radical prostatectomy - pro laparoscopic].

Authors:  H M Do; S Holze; H Qazi; A Dietel; T Häfner; E Liatsikos; J-U Stolzenburg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  [Laparoscopic pelvic surgery: Where do we stand in the year 2006?].

Authors:  J Rassweiler; D Teber; J de la Rosette; P Laguna; V Pansodoro; T Frede
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter?

Authors:  T R Herrmann; R Rabenalt; J U Stolzenburg; E N Liatsikos; F Imkamp; H Tezval; A J Gross; U Jonas; M Burchardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Discrepancies in perception of urinary incontinence between patient and physician after robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Seung Ryeol Lee; Hong Wook Kim; Jae Won Lee; Woo Ju Jeong; Koon Ho Rha; Jang Hwan Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  [Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  J Rotering; S Siemer; M Stöckle
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Impact of positive surgical margins on oncological outcome following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP): long-term results.

Authors:  Jonas Busch; Carsten Stephan; Annett Klutzny; Stefan Hinz; Carsten Kempkensteffen; Ergin Kilic; Michael Lein; Steffen Weikert; Kurt Miller; Ahmed Magheli
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Analysis of the pentafecta learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  D W Good; G D Stewart; J U Stolzenburg; S A McNeill
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Achieving proficiency with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Laparoscopic-trained versus robotics-trained surgeons.

Authors:  Brian Kim; Allen Chang; Jennifer Kaswick; Armen Derboghossians; Howard Jung; Jeff Slezak; Melanie Wuerstle; Stephen G Williams; Gary W Chien
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial 15 cases in Japan.

Authors:  K Yoshioka; T Hatano; Y Nakagami; C Ozu; Y Horiguchi; H Yonou; M Tachibana; G Coughlin; V R Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.