Literature DB >> 20879055

Discrepancies in perception of urinary incontinence between patient and physician after robotic radical prostatectomy.

Seung Ryeol Lee1, Hong Wook Kim, Jae Won Lee, Woo Ju Jeong, Koon Ho Rha, Jang Hwan Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Reported incidence of urinary incontinence after a radical prostatectomy (RP) varies between studies. This may be due not only to the definition of incontinence applied, but also how the information is acquired. We investigated the differences in perception of post robot-assisted laparoscopic RP (RALP) urinary incontinence acquired through doctor interviews and patient-reported questionnaires.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 238 consecutive men who underwent RALP by a single surgeon between July 2005 and February 2008, we evaluated 66 men using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) at various time points after surgery. Each patient's ICIQ results were considered to be the patient's perceptions of urinary incontinence. The physician at the same time directly interviewed the patients about the number of pads used and considered complete continence to be equivalent to the use of no pads or safety liners.
RESULTS: Of the 66 patients, the physician reported that 34 (51.5%) had obtained complete continence. However, analysis of the questionnaires of these 34 patients revealed that only 5 (14.7%) patients reported that they never leaked during the past 4 weeks. Most patients (11 patients, 32.4%) who did not use any pad did in fact reported leakage of a small or moderate amount of urine about once a day.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that there are discrepancies in the perception of urinary incontinence between doctor and patient after RALP. Nonuse of pads is not equivalent to obtaining complete urinary continence. Therefore, the number of pads used is not a good measure to determine the status of complete urinary continence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20879055      PMCID: PMC2995971          DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2010.51.6.883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonsei Med J        ISSN: 0513-5796            Impact factor:   2.759


  15 in total

1.  Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Emilio Sacco; Tommaso Prayer-Galetti; Francesco Pinto; Simonetta Fracalanza; Giovanni Betto; Francesco Pagano; Walter Artibani
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Differences in urologist and patient assessments of health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: results of the CaPSURE database.

Authors:  M S Litwin; D P Lubeck; J M Henning; P R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Assessment of subjective distress by patients' self-report versus structured interview.

Authors:  S V Eisen
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1995-02

4.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy--the experience of the German Laparoscopic Working Group.

Authors:  Jens Rassweiler; Jens Stolzenburg; Tullio Sulser; Serdar Deger; Jürgen Zumbé; Georg Hofmockel; Hubert John; Günther Janetschek; Jean-Luc Fehr; Martin Hatzinger; Michael Probst; Karl-Heinz Rothenberger; Vassilis Poulakis; Michael Truss; Gralf Popken; Jens Westphal; Uwe Alles; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  No relationship between subjective assessment of urinary incontinence and pad test weight gain in a random population sample of menopausal women.

Authors:  A M Ryhammer; S Laurberg; J C Djurhuus; A P Hermann
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting--the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; A S Tully; R Holmes; J Lindsay
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  A statistical comparison of pad numbers versus pad weights in the quantification of urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Drew A Dylewski; Margaret G Jamison; Kristy M Borawski; Neil D Sherman; Cindy L Amundsen; George D Webster
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.696

8.  Variation in continence and potency by definition.

Authors:  Tracey L Krupski; Christopher S Saigal; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy in patients previously submitted to holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic enlargement.

Authors:  Nazareno Suardi; Vincenzo Scattoni; Alberto Briganti; Andrea Salonia; Richard Naspro; Andrea Gallina; Andrea Cestari; Renzo Colombo; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Giorgio Guazzoni; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Comparison of the ICIQ-SF and 24-hour pad test with other measures for evaluating the severity of urodynamic stress incontinence.

Authors:  Emmanuel Karantanis; Michelle Fynes; Kate H Moore; Stuart L Stanton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-01-31
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Robotic Surgical System for Radical Prostatectomy: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-07-07

2.  Urinary Incontinence Could Be Controlled by an Inflatable Penile Prosthesis.

Authors:  Hyun Min Choi; Hyung Ki Choi; Hye-Yeon Lee
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 5.400

3.  Validated Prospective Assessment of Quality of Life After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: Beyond Continence and Erections.

Authors:  Simone Albisinni; Fouad Aoun; Thierry Quackels; Grégoire Assenmacher; Alexandre Peltier; Roland van Velthoven; Thierry Roumeguère
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2019 May-Jun

4.  Experience Measures after Radical Prostatectomy: A Register-Based Study Evaluating the Association between Patient-Reported Symptoms and Quality of Information.

Authors:  Ola Christiansen; Øyvind Kirkevold; Ola Bratt; Jūratė Šaltytė Benth; Marit Slaaen
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-12

5.  Prospective evaluation of urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using a validated questionnaire and daily pad use assessment: which definition is more relevant to the patient's perception of recovery?

Authors:  Akram Assem; Seif M Hamdy; Ahmad M Beltagy; Ali Serdar Gӧzen; Tamer Abou Youssif
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-04-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.