Literature DB >> 18338153

[Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy].

J Rotering1, S Siemer, M Stöckle.   

Abstract

The advantage of minimally invasive surgery in the form of laproscopic radical prostatectomy compared with open retropubic radical prostatectomy is indisputable. But a long learning curve seems to be a clear disadvantage. Robotic surgery devices such as the da Vinci system could be very helpful here. The aim of this study was to demonstrate our own experience with da Vinci prostatectomy in consideration of the learning curve. Since implementation of the da Vinci system 23 months ago, we have done over 300 operating procedures with the system. Despite of having great know how in laparoscopic surgery the conversion rate was only 1.7%. The oncological outcome was satisfactory and comparable with the results reported in the literature. A complication rate of only 5.1% also seems acceptable. With the da Vinci system, we can combine the advantages of a minimally invasive procedure with those of open surgery but without the disadvantage of a long learning curve. At the moment, the expense factor remains a handicap.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18338153     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-008-1656-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  11 in total

1.  Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  J Binder; W Kramer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis:the single knot method.

Authors:  Roland F Van Velthoven; Thomas E Ahlering; Alexandre Peltier; Douglas W Skarecky; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Intra- and peri-operative outcomes comparing radical retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a prospective, randomised, single-surgeon study.

Authors:  Giorgio Guazzoni; Andrea Cestari; Richard Naspro; Matteo Riva; Antonia Centemero; Matteo Zanoni; Lorenzo Rigatti; Patrizio Rigatti
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technical and early oncological assessment of 40 operations.

Authors:  B Guillonneau; X Cathelineau; E Barret; F Rozet; G Vallancien
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique.

Authors:  B Guillonneau; G Vallancien
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Ashutosh Tewari; Brad Baize; Bertrand Guillonneau; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 7.  Minimally invasive approaches to prostate cancer: a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Ari Abraham Hakimi; Marc Feder; Reza Ghavamian
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.510

8.  Prospective comparison of short-term convalescence: laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sam B Bhayani; Christian P Pavlovich; Thomas S Hsu; Wendy Sullivan; L i-Ming Su
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Javier Miller; Angela Smith; Erik Kouba; Eric Wallen; Raj S Pruthi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Joseph A Smith; Robert C Chan; Sam S Chang; S Duke Herrell; Peter E Clark; Roxy Baumgartner; Michael S Cookson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Radical prostatectomy - pro laparoscopic].

Authors:  H M Do; S Holze; H Qazi; A Dietel; T Häfner; E Liatsikos; J-U Stolzenburg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Robotic radical prostatectomy: The new gold standard.

Authors:  Sameer Chopra; Abhishek Srivastava; Ashutosh Tewari
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-02-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.