Literature DB >> 22179473

Evaluation of 2,590 urological laparoscopic surgeries undertaken by urological surgeons accredited by an endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in urological laparoscopy in Japan.

Tomonori Habuchi1, Toshiro Terachi, Hiromitsu Mimata, Yukihiro Kondo, Hiroomi Kanayama, Tomohiko Ichikawa, Kikuo Nutahara, Tsuneharu Miki, Yoshinari Ono, Shiro Baba, Seiji Naito, Tadashi Matsuda.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2003, the Japanese Urological Association (JUA) and Japanese Society of Endourology (JSE) established a urological laparoscopic skill qualification system, called the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System in Urological Laparoscopy of JUA and JSE (ESSQSJJ). The main goal of the system is to decrease the prevalence of complications associated with laparoscopic surgery. To validate the qualification system, perioperative outcome and the prevalence of complications in different types of urological laparoscopic surgery performed by accredited surgeons were evaluated.
METHODS: One hundred thirty-six surgeons who obtained the qualification in 2004 were prospectively asked to submit intraoperative and postoperative data of their latest 20 cases at the end of 2009, along with the number of laparoscopic urological surgeries performed in each year for a 5-year period (2004-2009). Intraoperative and postoperative complications were graded according to the Satava classification and modified Clavien classification, respectively.
RESULTS: Data of 2,590 urological laparoscopic surgeries of 130 surgeons, including 904 laparoscopic radical nephrectomies, 430 laparoscopic nephroureterectomies, 390 laparoscopic adrenalectomies, 320 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies, and 170 laparoscopic partial nephrectomies, were analyzed. Complications were noted in 97 (3.7%) patients. Major intraoperative complications (grade II or III) occurred in 32 (1.2%) patients, and major postoperative complications (grade III or higher) occurred in 24 (0.9%) patients. The prevalence of conversion to open surgery, allogeneic transfusion, and perioperative mortality was 2.5%, 1.6%, and 0%, respectively. The number of surgeries performed by each qualified surgeon or the role of the surgeon (main operator vs. mentor/instructor) in the surgery did not affect the prevalence of intraoperative complications or postoperative complications. The open conversion rate was significantly higher in surgeons with a low surgical volume.
CONCLUSIONS: ESSQSJJ can ensure urological laparoscopic surgeons who can perform various types of urological laparoscopic surgeries with a low prevalence of perioperative complications and reasonable outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22179473     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-2088-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  Complications of laparoscopic procedures in urology: experience with 2,407 procedures at 4 German centers.

Authors:  D Fahlenkamp; J Rassweiler; P Fornara; T Frede; S A Loening
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  The positive impact of laparoscopic adrenalectomy on complications of adrenal surgery.

Authors:  L M Brunt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in urological laparoscopy: a novel system in Japan.

Authors:  Tadashi Matsuda; Yoshinari Ono; Toshiro Terachi; Seiji Naito; Shiro Baba; Tsuneharu Miki; Yoshihiko Hirao; Akihiko Okuyama
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.

Authors:  François Rozet; Jamison Jaffe; Guillaume Braud; Justin Harmon; Xavier Cathelineau; Eric Barret; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Analysis of complications from 600 retroperitoneoscopic procedures of the upper urinary tract during the last 10 years.

Authors:  Dimitri Liapis; Alexandre de la Taille; Guillaume Ploussard; Grégoire Robert; Laurence Bastien; Andras Hoznek; Dimitri Vordos; Claude Abbou; Laurent Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Critical evaluation of perioperative complications in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Lucas Nogueira; Darren Katz; Rodrigo Pinochet; Guilherme Godoy; Jordan Kurta; Caroline J Savage; Angel M Cronin; Bertrand Guillonneau; Karim A Touijer; Jonathan A Coleman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Urological complications of laparoscopic surgery: experience with 350 procedures at a single center.

Authors:  M Soulie; P Seguin; L Richeux; P Mouly; N Vazzoler; F Pontonnier; P Plante
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Comparison of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and open radical nephrectomy for pathologic stage T1 and T2 renal cell carcinoma with clear cell histologic features: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Wooju Jeong; Koon H Rha; Hyeon H Kim; Seok-Soo Byun; Tae G Kwon; Ill Y Seo; Gyung T Sung; Seung H Jeon; Young B Jeong; Sung H Hong
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 9.  Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Jens J Rassweiler; Dogu Teber; Thomas Frede
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach.

Authors:  Surena F Matin; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.862

View more
  6 in total

1.  Retention of robot-assisted surgical skills in urological surgeons acquired using Mimic dV-Trainer.

Authors:  Jun Teishima; Minoru Hattori; Shogo Inoue; Kenichiro Ikeda; Keisuke Hieda; Shinya Ohara; Hiroyuki Egi; Hideki Ohdan; Akio Matsubara
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Feasibility of needlescopic surgery for colorectal cancer: safety and learning curve for Japanese Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System-unqualified young surgeons.

Authors:  Hisanori Miki; Yosuke Fukunaga; Toshiya Nagasaki; Takashi Akiyoshi; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Satoshi Nagayama; Masashi Ueno
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Analysis of laparoscopic dissection skill by instrument tip force measurement.

Authors:  Kenji Yoshida; Hidefumi Kinoshita; Yoshihiro Kuroda; Osamu Oshiro; Tadashi Matsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Transitional impact of short- and long-term outcomes of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer from Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0404.

Authors:  Shoichi Fujii; Tomonori Akagi; Masafumi Inomata; Hiroshi Katayama; Junki Mizusawa; Mitsuyoshi Ota; Shuji Saito; Yusuke Kinugasa; Shigeki Yamaguchi; Takeo Sato; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2019-03-26

5.  Morbidity assessment in surgery: refinement proposal based on a concept of perioperative adverse events.

Authors:  Airazat M Kazaryan; Bård I Røsok; Bjørn Edwin
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2013-05-16

6.  Complications of 411 laparoscopic urological procedures: A single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Khalid Al-Otaibi
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.