Literature DB >> 16332478

Colonoscopic perforations: a retrospective review.

Corey W Iqbal1, Yun Shin Chun, David R Farley.   

Abstract

Colonic perforation is no longer a rare complication of colonoscopy. Our previous report identified 45 such iatrogenic injuries from 1980 through 1994 (3082 colonoscopies per year). This follow-up of the ensuing 7 years examines changing trends of endoscopic usage in addition to management and prognosis of patients with colonoscopic perforations. Retrospective analysis of 78,702 colonoscopies (1994 through 2000, 11,243 colonoscopies per year) allowed assessment of medical records in all patients treated at our institution for colonic perforation. Sixty-six patients from our institution (perforation rate, 0.084%; 1 per 1192 procedures) and six patients from outside institutions were treated for colonic perforation following colonoscopy (41 women, 31 men; ages, 30-92 years; median, 73 years). Sixty-two patients underwent laparotomy, while 10 were managed nonoperatively. All 10 patients managed nonoperatively were void of peritoneal irritation by physical examination; eight patients did well (median hospital stay, 5.5 days; range, 0-12), but one death (family declined operative intervention) and one pelvic abscess requiring percutaneous drainage were noted. Peritoneal irritation by physical examination was evident in 57 of 62 patients undergoing laparotomy. Perforations occurred throughout the colon: right, 22 (31%); transverse, 5 (7%); left, 44 (61%); and unknown, 1 (1%). Thirty-eight patients (61%) underwent primary repair or resection with anastomosis. Fecal diversion was used in 100% of patients with extensive peritoneal contamination (n = 12) and 40% of patients with moderate contamination (12 of 30). Perioperative morbidity (39%) and mortality (8%) were significant. Factors predicting a poor outcome included delayed diagnosis, extensive peritoneal contamination, and patients using anticoagulants (P < .05). Compared with our prior study, the present review highlights a higher prevalence of injury based on more frequent use of colonoscopy. Perforation rates remain around 0.08%. While nonoperative management is viable in patients void of peritonitis, expedient surgical intervention seems to facilitate patient recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16332478     DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.06.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.267


  14 in total

1.  Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year study.

Authors:  M L Anderson; T M Pasha; J A Leighton
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Colonoscopic perforations.

Authors:  F Y Araghizadeh; A E Timmcke; F G Opelka; T C Hicks; D E Beck
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Management of colonoscopic perforations.

Authors:  D R Farley; M P Bannon; S P Zietlow; J H Pemberton; D M Ilstrup; D R Larson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Colonic perforation due to colonoscopy: a retrospective study of 48 cases.

Authors:  P Orsoni; S Berdah; C Verrier; A Caamano; B Sastre; R Boutboul; J C Grimaud; R Picaud
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  "Mini-perforation" of the colon--not all postpolypectomy perforations require laparotomy.

Authors:  J P Christie; J Marrazzo
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Laparoscopic repair of colonoscopic perforations of the colon.

Authors:  R T Schlinkert; T E Rasmussen
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1994-02

7.  Complications in endoscopy of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Therapy and prognosis.

Authors:  D Jentschura; M Raute; J Winter; T Henkel; M Kraus; B C Manegold
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Selective management of colonoscopic perforations.

Authors:  A Y Lo; H L Beaton
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study.

Authors:  J S Mandel; J H Bond; T R Church; D C Snover; G M Bradley; L M Schuman; F Ederer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Management of perforation of the colon at colonoscopy.

Authors:  H Kavin; F Sinicrope; A H Esker
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  52 in total

1.  Therapeutic options for iatrogenic colon perforation: feasibility of endoscopic clip closure and predictors of the need for early surgery.

Authors:  Sung Bum Cho; Wan Sik Lee; Young Eun Joo; Hyeng Rok Kim; Sang Wook Park; Chang Hwan Park; Hyeun Soo Kim; Sung Kyu Choi; Jong Sun Rew
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Adverse events in older patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day; Annette Kwon; John M Inadomi; Louise C Walter; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Tension pneumothorax, pneumoretroperitoneum, and subcutaneous emphysema after colonoscopic polypectomy: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Mile Ignjatović; Jasna Jović
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Endoclipping of iatrogenic colonic perforation to avoid surgery.

Authors:  Richard Magdeburg; Peter Collet; Stefan Post; Georg Kaehler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Colonoscopic perforation: A report from World Gastroenterology Organization endoscopy training center in Thailand.

Authors:  Varut Lohsiriwat; Sasithorn Sujarittanakarn; Thawatchai Akaraviputh; Narong Lertakyamanee; Darin Lohsiriwat; Udom Kachinthorn
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Is endoscopic closure with clips effective for both diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy-associated bowel perforation?

Authors:  Dong-Hoon Yang; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Kyung-Hoon Lee; Soon Man Yoon; Kyung Jo Kim; Byong Duk Ye; Seung-Jae Myung; Suk-Kyun Yang; Jin-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Lower rate of colonoscopic perforation: 110,785 patients of colonoscopy performed by colorectal surgeons in a large teaching hospital in China.

Authors:  Xiaohui Shi; Yongqi Shan; Enda Yu; Chuangang Fu; Ronggui Meng; Wei Zhang; Hantao Wang; Lianjie Liu; Liqiang Hao; Hao Wang; Miao Lin; Honglian Xu; Xiaodong Xu; Haifeng Gong; Zheng Lou; Haiyan He; Junjie Xing; Xianhua Gao; Beili Cai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Management of colonoscopic perforation: a systematic review and treatment algorithm.

Authors:  Khalid N Alsowaina; Mooyad A Ahmed; Nawar A Alkhamesi; Ahmad I Elnahas; Jeffrey D Hawel; Nitin V Khanna; Christopher M Schlachta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Colonoscopic splenic injuries: incidence and management.

Authors:  Ashwin S Kamath; Corey W Iqbal; Michael G Sarr; Daniel C Cullinane; Scott P Zietlow; David R Farley; Mark D Sawyer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Performance measures of surgeon-performed colonoscopy in a Veterans Affairs medical center.

Authors:  H S Tran Cao; B C Cosman; B Devaraj; S Ramamoorthy; T Savides; M L Krinsky; S Horgan; M A Talamini; M K Savu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.