Literature DB >> 21951478

Adverse events in older patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lukejohn W Day1, Annette Kwon, John M Inadomi, Louise C Walter, Ma Somsouk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that advancing age is an independent risk factor for experiencing adverse events during colonoscopy. Yet many of these studies are limited by small sample sizes and/or marked variation in reported outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence rates for specific adverse events in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy and calculate incidence rate ratios for selected comparison groups. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy.
DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Perforation, bleeding, cardiovascular (CV)/pulmonary complications, and mortality.
RESULTS: Our literature search yielded 3328 articles, of which 20 studies met our inclusion criteria. Pooled incidence rates for adverse events (per 1000 colonoscopies) in patients 65 years of age and older were 26.0 (95% CI, 25.0-27.0) for cumulative GI adverse events, 1.0 (95% CI, 0.9-1.5) for perforation, 6.3 (95% CI, 5.7-7.0) for GI bleeding, 19.1 (95% CI, 18.0-20.3) for CV/pulmonary complications, and 1.0 (95% CI, 0.7-2.2) for mortality. Among octogenarians, adverse events (per 1000 colonoscopies) were as follows: cumulative GI adverse event rate of 34.9 (95% CI, 31.9-38.0), perforation rate of 1.5 (95% CI, 1.1-1.9), GI bleeding rate of 2.4 (95% CI, 1.1-4.6), CV/pulmonary complication rate of 28.9 (95% CI, 26.2-31.8), and mortality rate of 0.5 (95% CI, 0.06-1.9). Patients 80 years of age and older experienced higher rates of cumulative GI adverse events (incidence rate ratio 1.7; 95% CI, 1.5-1.9) and had a greater risk of perforation (incidence rate ratio 1.6, 95% CI, 1.2-2.1) compared with younger patients (younger than 80 years of age). There was an increased trend toward higher rates of GI bleeding and CV/pulmonary complications in octogenarians but neither was statistically significant. LIMITATIONS: Heterogeneity of studies included and not all complications related to colonoscopy were captured.
CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients, especially octogenarians, appear to have a higher risk of complications during and after colonoscopy. These data should inform clinical decision making, the consent process, public health policy, and comparative effectiveness analyses.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21951478      PMCID: PMC3371336          DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  65 in total

1.  [Perforation of the colon during colonoscopy].

Authors:  K Nassiopoulos; C Chanson; P Petropoulos
Journal:  Swiss Surg       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Complications of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  J D Waye; O Kahn; M E Auerbach
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  1996-04

Review 3.  Complications of conscious sedation.

Authors:  S B Benjamin
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  1996-04

4.  Colonoscopy in the elderly: a study of 200 cases.

Authors:  P Chatrenet; P Friocourt; J P Ramain; M Cherrier; J B Maillard
Journal:  Eur J Med       Date:  1993 Aug-Sep

5.  Complications in endoscopy of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Therapy and prognosis.

Authors:  D Jentschura; M Raute; J Winter; T Henkel; M Kraus; B C Manegold
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Prospective analysis of complications 30 days after outpatient colonoscopy.

Authors:  R Zubarik; D E Fleischer; C Mastropietro; J Lopez; J Carroll; S Benjamin; G Eisen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Colonoscopy in octogenarians: a review of 428 cases.

Authors:  T C Sardinha; J J Nogueras; E D Ehrenpreis; D Zeitman; V Estevez; E G Weiss; S D Wexner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study.

Authors:  J S Mandel; J H Bond; T R Church; D C Snover; G M Bradley; L M Schuman; F Ederer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Colonoscopy: a prospective report of complications.

Authors:  J D Waye; B S Lewis; S Yessayan
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.062

10.  Colonoscopy in the elderly. Low risk, high yield.

Authors:  T Ure; K Dehghan; A M Vernava; W E Longo; C A Andrus; G L Daniel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  53 in total

Review 1.  Which Patient-Related Factors Determine Optimal Bowel Preparation?

Authors:  Myriam Martel; Charles Ménard; Sophie Restellini; Omar Kherad; Majid Almadi; Maïté Bouchard; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12

2.  Perspectives: should older patients be screened for colorectal cancer?

Authors:  James Buxbaum; Edward Schneider
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Influence of Age, Health, and Function on Cancer Screening in Older Adults with Limited Life Expectancy.

Authors:  Nancy L Schoenborn; Jin Huang; Orla C Sheehan; Jennifer L Wolff; David L Roth; Cynthia M Boyd
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Optimal Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy in the Elderly Patient.

Authors:  Samuel B Ho; Rita Hovsepians; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Frailty Assessment Predicts Acute Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Sasha Taleban; Nima Toosizadeh; Shilpa Junna; Todd Golden; Sehem Ghazala; Rita Wadeea; Coco Tirambulo; Jane Mohler
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Lower rate of colonoscopic perforation: 110,785 patients of colonoscopy performed by colorectal surgeons in a large teaching hospital in China.

Authors:  Xiaohui Shi; Yongqi Shan; Enda Yu; Chuangang Fu; Ronggui Meng; Wei Zhang; Hantao Wang; Lianjie Liu; Liqiang Hao; Hao Wang; Miao Lin; Honglian Xu; Xiaodong Xu; Haifeng Gong; Zheng Lou; Haiyan He; Junjie Xing; Xianhua Gao; Beili Cai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Risk of colonoscopic post-polypectomy bleeding in patients after the discontinuation of antithrombotic therapy.

Authors:  Takaaki Kishino; Tsuneo Oyama; Kinichi Hotta; Eiji Ishii; Tamaki Momoi; Takehiro Shimizu; Kenji Kunieda; Shinichiro Takeda; Hirokazu Komatsu
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Surgical Management of Iatrogenic Perforation of the Gastrointestinal Tract: 15 Years of Experience in a Single Center.

Authors:  Christoph Holmer; Christoph A Mallmann; Marlis A Musch; Martin E Kreis; Jörn Gröne
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Repeat colonoscopy after a colonoscopy with a negative result in Ontario: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lieke Hol; Rinku Sutradhar; Sumei Gu; Nancy N Baxter; Linda Rabeneck; Jill M Tinmouth; Lawrence F Paszat
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02

10.  Performing colonoscopy in elderly and very elderly patients: Risks, costs and benefits.

Authors:  Otto S Lin
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.