Literature DB >> 8739828

Improved accuracy of computed tomography in local staging of rectal cancer using water enema.

L Lupo1, G Angelelli, O Pannarale, D Altomare, L Macarini, V Memeo.   

Abstract

A new technique in the preoperative staging computed tomography of rectal cancer using a water enema to promote full distension of the rectum was compared with standard CT in a non-randomised blind study. One hundred and twenty-one patients were enrolled. There were 57 in the water enema CT group and 64 in the standard group. The stage of the disease was assessed following strict criteria and tested against the pathological examination of the resected specimen. Water enema CT was significantly more accurate than standard CT with an accuracy of 84.2% vs. 62.5% (Kappa: 0.56 vs. 0.33: Kappa Weighted: 0.93 vs. 0.84). The diagnostic gain was mainly evident in the identification of rectal wall invasion within or beyond the muscle layer (94.7 vs. 61). The increased accuracy was 33.7% (CL95: 17-49; P < 0.001). The results indicate that water enema CT should replace CT for staging rectal cancer and may offer an alternative to endorectal ultrasound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8739828     DOI: 10.1007/bf00342461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  33 in total

1.  Water as contrast medium for computed tomography study of colonic wall lesions.

Authors:  K J Gossios; E V Tsianos; D S Kontogiannis; L L Demou; C K Tatsis; V P Papakostas; M M Merkouropoulos; E C Tsimoyiannis
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1992

2.  Pre- or postoperative radiotherapy in rectal and rectosigmoid carcinoma. Report from a randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  L Påhlman; B Glimelius
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Biases in the assessment of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  C B Begg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Preoperative short-term radiation therapy in operable rectal carcinoma. A prospective randomized trial. Stockholm Rectal Cancer Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  How useful is pre-operative computerized tomography scanning in staging rectal cancer?

Authors:  P Chapuis; S Kos; L Bokey; O Dent; R Newland; J Hinder
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1989-01

6.  Computed tomography in staging of rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  B Adalsteinsson; B Glimelius; S Graffman; A Hemmingsson; L Påhlman
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb

7.  The clinical staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  R J Nicholls; A Y Mason; B C Morson; A K Dixon; I K Fry
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 8.  Local excision of rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  R A Graham; L Garnsey; J M Jessup
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Staging rectal cancer by MR and CT.

Authors:  R J Butch; D D Stark; J Wittenberg; J E Tepper; S Saini; J F Simeone; P R Mueller; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Staging of rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of endorectal US and CT.

Authors:  M D Rifkin; S M Ehrlich; G Marks
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparative study of three-dimensional and conventional endorectal ultrasonography used in rectal cancer staging.

Authors:  J C Kim; Y K Cho; S Y Kim; S K Park; M G Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance in preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison with histologic findings.

Authors:  Paolo P Bianchi; Chiara Ceriani; Matteo Rottoli; Guido Torzilli; Giovanni Pompili; Alberto Malesci; Monica Ferraroni; Marco Montorsi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.267

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.