Literature DB >> 3882360

Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by intrarectal ultrasound.

U Hildebrandt, G Feifel.   

Abstract

Digital examination and computed tomography are the current modalities employed to assess the depth of invasion of rectal cancer. Each technique has limitations in that high rectal tumors cannot be examined digitally and CT is unable to detect small tumors. However, preoperative diagnostic capability can be improved with the use of intrarectal ultrasound. We have examined 25 patients with rectal cancer preoperatively with digital examination and intrarectal ultrasound. In order to determine the accuracy of the ultrasonic method, we compared the results to the histopathologic findings of the excised specimen. Digital examination was essentially impossible in eight of the 25 rectal tumors because the tumors were either unreachable or could not be palpated in their full longitudinal extent. Of the remaining 17, digital examination corresponded with pathologic findings in 15, while tumor spread was overestimated in two patients. Sonography corresponded with pathologic findings in 23 of the 25 tumors. Two had been overstaged. Analogous to the TNM classification for postoperative pathologic tumor staging, we propose a preoperative tumor staging based on ultrasonic determination of the infiltrative depth of tumor, which we call uTNM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3882360     DOI: 10.1007/bf02553906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  64 in total

Review 1.  Optimising treatment for resectable rectal cancer: is preoperative therapy beneficial?

Authors:  S Y Ngan
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  New diagnostic imaging in rectal cancer: endosonography and immunoscintigraphy.

Authors:  G Feifel; U Hildebrandt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Endorectal sonography for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  D D Dershaw
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1992-07

Review 4.  Rectal and anal endosonography.

Authors:  N Mortensen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Rectal endosonography for the visualisation of the anastomosis after anterior resection and its relevance to local recurrence.

Authors:  R M Charnley; M F Heywood; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Lower gastrointestinal endoultrasound.

Authors:  M Boscaini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  An evaluation of the role of rectal endosonography in rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Beynon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy in stage T3, N0 rectal cancer.

Authors:  Deniz Tural; Fatih Selcukbiricik; Özcan Yıldız; Olgun Elcin; Sibel Erdamar; Sabri Güney; Fuat Demireli; Evin Büyükünal; Süheyla Serdengeçti
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Role of three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography in the assessment of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy: preliminary results.

Authors:  Sthela M Murad-Regadas; Francisco Sergio P Regadas; Lusmar V Rodrigues; Rosilma G L Barreto; Francisco Coracy C Monteiro; Beethoven B Landim; Erico C Holanda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Colonoscopic ultrasound is associated with a learning phenomenon despite previous rigid probe experience.

Authors:  Pulathis N Siriwardana; Shivanthi J De S Hewavisenthi; Arunasalam Pathmeswaran; Kemal I Deen
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.