Literature DB >> 16331485

Normal values of distance heterophoria and fusional vergence ranges and effects of age.

Catalina Palomo Alvarez1, María C Puell, Celia Sánchez-Ramos, Consuelo Villena.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although it is well known that age affects visual function, we still have much to learn about the impact of aging on binocular vision. Our aim was to establish distance heterophoria and distance fusional vergence ranges in a large non-clinical population of wide age range, to provide normal values for comparisons.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed on 271 non-clinical subjects stratified into six age groups. Distance heterophoria measurements were obtained using the von Graefe technique and distance horizontal fusional vergence ranges using Risley rotary prisms in each subject, with best spectacle correction.
RESULTS: The mean heterophoria value for distance fixation was exophoric except for the 71-80 year age group, which was esophoric. No effects of age were observed on distance heterophoria and distance base-in and base-out break means. However, a significant effect of age was noted on base-in recovery and base-out recovery. Between the youngest and oldest age groups, mean base-in recovery decreased by 2.5 Delta and mean base-out recovery by 3.3 Delta.
CONCLUSIONS: Distance base-in and base-out recovery means diminished significantly with age such that recovery values fell outside the norm in subjects in the 61-70 year age group and older. This study establishes statistical normal values for distance heterophoria and fusional vergence in a non-clinical population. Mean values such as these are valuable tools for identifying subjects with far binocular anomalies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16331485     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-005-0166-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  8 in total

Review 1.  Statistical normal values of visual parameters that characterize binocular function in children.

Authors:  R Jiménez; M A Pérez; J A García; M D González
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Normal heterophoric changes: 20 years' follow-up.

Authors:  A Spierer; L Hefetz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Evaluation of a new criterion of binocularity.

Authors:  K M Daum; R P Rutstein; G Houston; K A Clore; D A Corliss
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Relation between distance heterophoria and tonic vergence.

Authors:  W F O'Shea; K J Ciuffreda; S K Fisher; B Tannen; P Super
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1988-10

5.  Vergence adaptation and the order of clinical vergence range testing.

Authors:  M Rosenfield; K J Ciuffreda; E Ong; S Super
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Physiological exophoria.

Authors:  B E Freier; L D Pickwell
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Population study of fixation disparity, heterophoria, and vergence.

Authors:  J J Saladin; J E Sheedy
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1978-11

8.  Binocular vision impairment after refractive surgery.

Authors:  Daisy Godts; Marie-José Tassignon; Laure Gobin
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.351

  8 in total
  17 in total

1.  Binocular function in school children with reading difficulties.

Authors:  Catalina Palomo-Alvarez; María C Puell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Binocular vision and abnormal head posture in children when watching television.

Authors:  Di Zhang; Wei-Hong Zhang; Shu-Zhen Dai; Hai-Ying Peng; Li-Ya Wang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Causes, background, and characteristics of binocular diplopia in the elderly.

Authors:  Manami Kawai; Toshiaki Goseki; Hitoshi Ishikawa; Miki Hoshina; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-12       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Geriatric patients are predisposed to strabismus following thyroid-related orbital decompression surgery: A multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Chris Y Wu; Alon Kahana
Journal:  Orbit       Date:  2017-02-14

5.  The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays.

Authors:  Takashi Shibata; Joohwan Kim; David M Hoffman; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Comparison of subjective cyclofusion ranges and objective ocular torsion in normal participants according to age.

Authors:  Manami Kawai; Toshiaki Goseki; Takashi Okano; Hitoshi Ishikawa
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.535

7.  Cataract surgery is not associated with post-operative binocular vision anomalies in age-related cataract patients.

Authors:  Qing-Qing Tan; James S Lewis; Chang-Jun Lan; Xuan Liao; Xiao-Li Tang; Jingyun Wang; Saeed Aljohani; Mitchell M Scheiman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-06-12       Impact factor: 3.992

8.  Motility disturbances in the tube versus trabeculectomy study during the first year of follow-up.

Authors:  Frederick M Rauscher; Steven J Gedde; Joyce C Schiffman; William J Feuer; Keith Barton; Richard K Lee
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  OculoMotor Assessment Tool Test Procedure and Normative Data.

Authors:  Chang Yaramothu; Christopher J Morris; John Vito d'Antonio-Bertagnolli; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.106

10.  Clinical profile of 80-year-old and older thyroid eye disease patients.

Authors:  Niv Levy; Hana Leiba; Klara Landau; Ofira Zloto; Ruth Huna-Baron
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 3.535

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.