Literature DB >> 2726166

Evaluation of a new criterion of binocularity.

K M Daum1, R P Rutstein, G Houston, K A Clore, D A Corliss.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess a new criterion for binocular comfort analogous to the classical Sheard's criterion. Instead of equating the fusional demand with the monocular phoria as is done when Sheard's criterion is applied, the new criterion uses a calculated binocular fusional demand. The binocular demand was derived using a clinical measurement of the convergence accommodation per convergence (CA/C) ratio. Sheard's criterion was also evaluated. Other commonly used indicators of binocularity (heterophoria, vergences, accommodative amplitude, facility and response, fixation disparity, and the associated phoria) were measured. One hundred subjects (52 males, 48 females; mean age 26 years) were classified as either symptomatic or asymptomatic by an interviewing clinician. The examining clinician was intentionally masked as to the classification of the subjects. We hypothesized that the new criterion would best discriminate between the two groups of patients inasmuch as it is based on currently accepted dual-interaction models of accommodation and vergence. Our analysis confirmed that the CA/C ratio corresponded closely to those published previously (mean = 0.06 D/delta). Significant differences (p less than 0.05) were determined between the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups for gender, near phoria through a +2.00 D add, accommodative amplitude, positive vergences at near, and both the classical Sheard's and the new criterion. The new criterion was the best discriminator between the groups, identifying 72% correctly, an improvement of 6% over the classical Sheard's. However, various stepwise discriminant analysis procedures consistently failed to demonstrate that the calculated binocular fusional demand or the new criterion was superior to the near phoria or the classical Sheard's value. These results suggest potential clinical utility for new procedures based on recently described models of accommodation and vergence, but further development appears necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2726166     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-198904000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  6 in total

1.  Latent ocular deviations in patients with advanced AIDS.

Authors:  E España-Gregori; R Montés-Micó; I Bueno-Gimeno; M Díaz-Llopi; J L Menezo-Rozalén
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Normal values of distance heterophoria and fusional vergence ranges and effects of age.

Authors:  Catalina Palomo Alvarez; María C Puell; Celia Sánchez-Ramos; Consuelo Villena
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Binocular function in school children with reading difficulties.

Authors:  Catalina Palomo-Alvarez; María C Puell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Effect of the base-out recovery point as the surgical target for acute acquired comitant esotropia.

Authors:  Zhiyue Dai; Fuhao Zheng; Meiping Xu; Jinjing Zhou; Minghui Wan; Huanyun Yu; Fang Hou; Jinmao Chen; Xinping Yu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Effects of wearing yellow spectacles on visual skills, reading speed, and visual symptoms in children with reading difficulties.

Authors:  Catalina Palomo-Álvarez; María C Puell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Ocular convergence deficits in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Mark S Bolding; Adrienne C Lahti; Timothy J Gawne; Kristine B Hopkins; Demet Gurler; Paul D Gamlin
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.157

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.