Literature DB >> 16328224

A practical approach to spine registers in Europe: the Swedish experience.

Peter Fritzell1, Björn Strömqvist, Olle Hägg.   

Abstract

Today there is growing awareness among spine surgeons of the advantages in using registers to facilitate the analyses and reporting of treatment outcome. The Swedish Spine register is among the first to be used on a national scale and annual reports are published in international journals. In this paper we discuss our experiences and lessons learned from a paper-based version in 1993, to an online web-based solution in 2005. We emphasise the advantages of registers being owned by the national spine society, a support function available during working hours, online feedback to participating departments and professional assistance in designing a register program for web use. Hopefully, our experiences will be of help to colleagues who are planning to start registering.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16328224      PMCID: PMC3454551          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-1051-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  13 in total

1.  The Swedish National Register for lumbar spine surgery: Swedish Society for Spinal Surgery.

Authors:  B Strömqvist; B Jönsson; P Fritzell; O Hägg; B E Larsson; B Lind
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2001-04

Review 2.  A European spine registry.

Authors:  C Röder; A El-Kerdi; D Grob; M Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  "Spine Tango" spine registry.

Authors:  Peter Fritzell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group.

Authors:  P Fritzell; O Hägg; P Wessberg; A Nordwall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group.

Authors:  Peter Fritzell; Olle Hägg; Per Wessberg; Anders Nordwall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Characteristics of patients with chronic low back pain selected for surgery: a comparison with the general population reported from the Swedish lumbar spine study.

Authors:  Olle Hägg; Peter Fritzell; Anders Nordwall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Cost-effectiveness of lumbar fusion and nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain in the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group.

Authors:  Peter Fritzell; Olle Hägg; Dick Jonsson; Anders Nordwall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The Swedish National Cataract Register: A 9-year review.

Authors:  Mats Lundström; Ulf Stenevi; William Thorburn
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2002-06

10.  Low back pain hospitalization. Recent United States trends and regional variations.

Authors:  V M Taylor; R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; W Kreuter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  Development of a documentation instrument for the conservative treatment of spinal disorders in the International Spine Registry, Spine Tango.

Authors:  J T Kessler; M Melloh; Thomas Zweig; E Aghayev; C Röder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The international spine registry SPINE TANGO: status quo and first results.

Authors:  Markus Melloh; Lukas Staub; Emin Aghayev; Thomas Zweig; Thomas Barz; Jean-Claude Theis; Albert Chavanne; Dieter Grob; Max Aebi; Christoph Roeder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Would loss to follow-up bias the outcome evaluation of patients operated for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine?

Authors:  Tore K Solberg; Andreas Sørlie; Kristin Sjaavik; Øystein P Nygaard; Tor Ingebrigtsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 4.  Evidence and practice in spine registries.

Authors:  Miranda L van Hooff; Wilco C H Jacobs; Paul C Willems; Michel W J M Wouters; Marinus de Kleuver; Wilco C Peul; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Peter Fritzell
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  The Nijmegen decision tool for chronic low back pain. Development of a clinical decision tool for secondary or tertiary spine care specialists.

Authors:  Miranda L van Hooff; Jan van Loon; Jacques van Limbeek; Marinus de Kleuver
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Results from a randomized controlled study between total disc replacement and fusion compared with results from a spine register.

Authors:  Svante Berg; Hans Tropp
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2010-09-01

7.  Swespine: the Swedish spine register : the 2012 report.

Authors:  Björn Strömqvist; Peter Fritzell; Olle Hägg; Bo Jönsson; Bengt Sandén
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.134

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.