Literature DB >> 16326789

Hearing the patient's voice? Factors affecting the use of patient survey data in quality improvement.

E Davies1, P D Cleary.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a framework for understanding factors affecting the use of patient survey data in quality improvement.
DESIGN: Qualitative interviews with senior health professionals and managers and a review of the literature.
SETTING: A quality improvement collaborative in Minnesota, USA involving teams from eight medical groups, focusing on how to use patient survey data to improve patient centred care. PARTICIPANTS: Eight team leaders (medical, clinical improvement or service quality directors) and six team members (clinical improvement coordinators and managers).
RESULTS: Respondents reported three types of barriers before the collaborative: organisational, professional and data related. Organisational barriers included lack of supporting values for patient centred care, competing priorities, and lack of an effective quality improvement infrastructure. Professional barriers included clinicians and staff not being used to focusing on patient interaction as a quality issue, individuals not necessarily having been selected, trained or supported to provide patient centred care, and scepticism, defensiveness or resistance to change following feedback. Data related barriers included lack of expertise with survey data, lack of timely and specific results, uncertainty over the effective interventions or time frames for improvement, and consequent risk of perceived low cost effectiveness of data collection. Factors that appeared to have promoted data use included board led strategies to change culture and create quality improvement forums, leadership from senior physicians and managers, and the persistence of quality improvement staff over several years in demonstrating change in other areas.
CONCLUSION: Using patient survey data may require a more concerted effort than for other clinical data. Organisations may need to develop cultures that support patient centred care, quality improvement capacity, and to align professional receptiveness and leadership with technical expertise with the data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16326789      PMCID: PMC1744097          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2004.012955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  14 in total

1.  The increasing importance of patient surveys. Now that sound methods exist, patient surveys can facilitate improvement.

Authors:  P D Cleary
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts?

Authors:  Judith H Hibbard; Jean Stockard; Martin Tusler
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  Methods for incorporating patients' views in health care.

Authors:  Michel Wensing; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-19

4.  Evaluation of quality improvement programmes.

Authors:  J Øvretveit; D Gustafson
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-09

5.  Feedback based on patient evaluations: a tool for quality improvement?

Authors:  Michel Wensing; Eric Vingerhoets; Richard Grol
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2003-10

6.  Managing transitions: assuring the adoption and impact of TQM.

Authors:  A D Kaluzny; C P McLaughlin
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1992-11

7.  Adjusting for patient characteristics when analyzing reports from patients about hospital care.

Authors:  J L Hargraves; I B Wilson; A Zaslavsky; C James; J D Walker; G Rogers; P D Cleary
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Feedback of patients' evaluations of general practice care: a randomised trial.

Authors:  E Vingerhoets; M Wensing; R Grol
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-12

9.  Using patient reports to improve medical care: a preliminary report from 10 hospitals.

Authors:  P D Cleary; S Edgman-Levitan; J D Walker; M Gerteis; T L Delbanco
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 0.926

10.  Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement/total quality management: concept versus implementation.

Authors:  S M Shortell; J L O'Brien; J M Carman; R W Foster; E F Hughes; H Boerstler; E J O'Connor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  40 in total

1.  Assessing the utility of consumer surveys for improving the quality of behavioral health care services.

Authors:  J Randy Koch; Alison B Breland; Mary Nash; Karen Cropsey
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Toward a Theory of a Right to Health: Capability and Incompletely Theorized Agreements.

Authors:  Jennifer Prah Ruger
Journal:  Yale J Law Humanit       Date:  2006

3.  Assessing Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Measures for Surveillance of Communication Outcomes.

Authors:  Richard L Street; Kathleen M Mazor; Neeraj K Arora
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  General practitioners' experience and benefits from patient evaluations.

Authors:  Hanne N Heje; Peter Vedsted; Frede Olesen
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 5.  Understanding and Using Patient Experience Feedback to Improve Health Care Quality: Systematic Review and Framework Development.

Authors:  Emmanuel Kumah; Felix Osei-Kesse; Cynthia Anaba
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2017-01-31

6.  Determining the interviewer effect on CQ Index outcomes: a multilevel approach.

Authors:  Sjenny Winters; Mathilde H Strating; Niek S Klazinga; Rudolf B Kool; Robbert Huijsman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Usefulness of a national parent experience survey in quality improvement: views of paediatric department employees.

Authors:  Hilde Hestad Iversen; Øyvind Andresen Bjertnæs; Gøril Groven; Geir Bukholm
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-05-31

8.  Evaluating the use of a modified CAHPS survey to support improvements in patient-centred care: lessons from a quality improvement collaborative.

Authors:  Elizabeth Davies; Dale Shaller; Susan Edgman-Levitan; Dana G Safran; Gary Oftedahl; John Sakowski; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Validation of a Comprehensive Patient Experience Survey for Addiction and Mental Health that was Co-designed with Service Users.

Authors:  Shawn R Currie; Priscilla Liu; Jassandre Adamyk-Simpson; Jesse Stanich
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2020-01-01

10.  The association between GP and patient ratings of quality of care at outpatient clinics.

Authors:  Oyvind A Bjertnaes; Andrew Garratt; Hilde Iversen; Torleif Ruud
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 2.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.