Literature DB >> 12486994

Evaluation of quality improvement programmes.

J Øvretveit1, D Gustafson.   

Abstract

In response to increasing concerns about quality, many countries are carrying out large scale programmes which include national quality strategies, hospital programmes, and quality accreditation, assessment and review processes. Increasing amounts of resources are being devoted to these interventions, but do they ensure or improve quality of care? There is little research evidence as to their effectiveness or the conditions for maximum effectiveness. Reasons for the lack of evaluation research include the methodological challenges of measuring outcomes and attributing causality to these complex, changing, long term social interventions to organisations or health systems, which themselves are complex and changing. However, methods are available which can be used to evaluate these programmes and which can provide decision makers with research based guidance on how to plan and implement them. This paper describes the research challenges, the methods which can be used, and gives examples and guidance for future research. It emphasises the important contribution which such research can make to improving the effectiveness of these programmes and to developing the science of quality improvement.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12486994      PMCID: PMC1743631          DOI: 10.1136/qhc.11.3.270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  22 in total

Review 1.  External assessment of health care.

Authors:  C Shaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-07

Review 2.  External quality mechanisms for health care: summary of the ExPeRT project on visitatie, accreditation, EFQM and ISO assessment in European Union countries. External Peer Review Techniques. European Foundation for Quality Management. International Organization for Standardization.

Authors:  C D Shaw
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.038

3.  The economics of quality--a practical approach.

Authors:  J Øvretveit
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv       Date:  2000

4.  Quality evaluation and indicator comparison in health care.

Authors:  J Øvretveit
Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage       Date:  2001 Jul-Sep

5.  Complexity, leadership, and management in healthcare organisations.

Authors:  P E Plsek; T Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-29

6.  The Norwegian approach to integrated quality development.

Authors:  J Ovretveit
Journal:  J Manag Med       Date:  2001

7.  The external review of quality improvement in health care organizations: a qualitative study.

Authors:  K Walshe; L Wallace; T Freeman; L Latham; P Spurgeon
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.038

8.  Assessing the progress of TQM in US hospitals: findings from two studies.

Authors:  S M Shortell; J L O'Brien; E F Hughes; J M Carman; R W Foster; H Boerstler; E J O'Connor
Journal:  Qual Lett Healthc Lead       Date:  1994-04

Review 9.  A report card on continuous quality improvement.

Authors:  D Blumenthal; C M Kilo
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 10.  Management matters: the link between hospital organisation and quality of patient care.

Authors:  E West
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-03
View more
  56 in total

Review 1.  Quality improvement implementation and disparities: the case of the health disparities collaboratives.

Authors:  Marshall H Chin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Hearing the patient's voice? Factors affecting the use of patient survey data in quality improvement.

Authors:  E Davies; P D Cleary
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-12

Review 3.  Quality improvement of paediatric care in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Tom W J Schulpen; Kiki M J Lombarts
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 4.  What do perioperative national clinical audits tell us? The evolving role of national audits in changing practice and improving outcomes.

Authors:  C M Oliver; S Hare
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2019-07-05

5.  Maintenance of Certification Part IV Quality-Improvement Project for Hypertension Control: A Preliminary Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Vallerie A Kolasinski; David W Price
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2015-03-01

6.  Cost-effectiveness of a pressure ulcer quality collaborative.

Authors:  Peter Makai; Marc Koopmanschap; Roland Bal; Anna P Nieboer
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2010-06-01

7.  Understanding uptake of continuous quality improvement in Indigenous primary health care: lessons from a multi-site case study of the Audit and Best Practice for Chronic Disease project.

Authors:  Karen L Gardner; Michelle Dowden; Samantha Togni; Ross Bailie
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Opening the black box of quality improvement collaboratives: an Actor-Network theory approach.

Authors:  Tineke Broer; Anna P Nieboer; Roland A Bal
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Understanding integrated care: a comprehensive conceptual framework based on the integrative functions of primary care.

Authors:  Pim P Valentijn; Sanneke M Schepman; Wilfrid Opheij; Marc A Bruijnzeels
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 5.120

10.  RCGP Quality Team Development programme: an illuminative evaluation.

Authors:  F Macfarlane; T Greenhalgh; T Schofield; T Desombre
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.