Literature DB >> 12702627

Methods for incorporating patients' views in health care.

Michel Wensing1, Glyn Elwyn.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2003        PMID： 12702627      PMCID： PMC1125777          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.326.7394.877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  22 in total

1.  Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  M Ryan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.

Authors:  Phil Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike Clarke; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Sarah Pratap; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

3.  A trial for comparing methods for eliciting treatment preferences from men with advanced prostate cancer: results from the initial visit.

Authors:  J Souchek; J R Stacks; B Brody; C M Ashton; R B Giesler; M M Byrne; K Cook; J M Geraci; N P Wray
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Implementation barriers for general practice guidelines on low back pain a qualitative study.

Authors:  H Schers; M Wensing; Z Huijsmans; M van Tulder; R Grol
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Quality of care from the perspective of elderly people: the QUOTE-elderly instrument.

Authors:  H J Sixma; C van Campen; J J Kerssens; L Peters
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 10.668

6.  Comparison of patients' preferences and evaluations regarding aspects of general practice care.

Authors:  H Jung; M Wensing; A de Wilt; F Olesen; R Grol
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 7.  Can patients evaluate the quality of hospital care?

Authors:  H R Rubin
Journal:  Med Care Rev       Date:  1990

8.  Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP).

Authors:  R Grol; M Wensing; J Mainz; P Ferreira; H Hearnshaw; P Hjortdahl; F Olesen; M Ribacke; T Spenser; J Szécsényi
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  Patient satisfaction: a valid concept?

Authors:  B Williams
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Analysis of non-response bias in a mailed health survey.

Authors:  J F Etter; T V Perneger
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.437
View more
  52 in total

1.  Medical Errors: Why Now and What's Next?

Authors:  Ahmed Al-Mandhari
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2015-09

2.  Hearing the patient's voice? Factors affecting the use of patient survey data in quality improvement.

Authors:  E Davies; P D Cleary
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-12

3.  Measuring performance quality in general practice: is international harmonization desirable?

Authors:  Richard Grol; Michel Wensing
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Measuring quality through performance. Respecting the subjective: quality measurement from the patient's perspective.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Stephen Buetow; Judith Hibbard; Michel Wensing
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-11-17

5.  Client preferences affect treatment satisfaction, completion, and clinical outcome: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Oliver Lindhiem; Charles B Bennett; Christopher J Trentacosta; Caitlin McLear
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-06-16

6.  A conditional model of evidence-based decision making.

Authors:  Paul R Falzer; Melissa D Garman
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 7.  Money matters: exploiting the data from outcomes research for quality improvement initiatives.

Authors:  Franco M Impellizzeri; Mario Bizzini; Michael Leunig; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Relationships between personal beliefs and treatment acceptability, and preferences for behavioral treatments.

Authors:  Souraya Sidani; Joyal Miranda; Dana R Epstein; Richard R Bootzin; Jennifer Cousins; Patricia Moritz
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2009-06-24

9.  Patient Preferences for Features of Health Care Delivery Systems: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Axel C Mühlbacher; Susanne Bethge; Shelby D Reed; Kevin A Schulman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Patient-identified quality indicators for colonoscopy services.

Authors:  Maida J Sewitch; Catherine Dubé; Stephanie Brien; Mengzhu Jiang; Robert J Hilsden; Alan N Barkun; David Armstrong
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.522
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.