| Literature DB >> 16321164 |
Girardin Jean-Louis1, Daniel F Kripke, Jeffrey A Elliott, Ferdinand Zizi, Arthur H Wolintz, Douglas R Lazzaro.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ocular pathology lessens light's efficacy to maintain optimal circadian entrainment. We examined whether ophthalmic dysfunction explains unique variance in melatonin excretion of older adults over and above the variance explained by daily illumination, medical, and sociodemographic factors. We also examined whether ophthalmic dysfunction influences relationships between ambient illumination and melatonin.Entities:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16321164 PMCID: PMC1325258 DOI: 10.1186/1740-3391-3-13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Circadian Rhythms ISSN: 1740-3391
Values represent adjusted mean ± standard error of ophthalmic measures. Data obtained for visual acuity were converted into logMAR units. Intraocular pressure and horizontal and vertical cup-to-disk ratios were log-transformed. For visual field mean deviation and nerve-fiber-layer thickness, a z-transformation procedure was used. Values were adjusted for effects of age and gender.
| -0.27 ± 0.07 | -0.18 ± 0.06 | 0.872 | 0.359 | |
| 1.25 ± 0.02 | 1.18 ± 0.02 | 4.991 | 0.034 | |
| -0.39 ± 0.06 | -0.56 ± 0.05 | 6.090 | 0.020 | |
| -0.44 ± 0.05 | -0.60 ± 0.04 | 5.060 | 0.033 | |
| -0.52 ± 0.33 | 0.13 ± 0.27 | 2.064 | 0.163 | |
| -0.36 ± 0.32 | 0.53 ± 0.28 | 4.011 | 0.056 | |
Adjusted mean values ± standard error for illumination (lux), melatonin (aMT6s), and sleep measures. Values were adjusted for effects of age and gender.
| 1.03 ± 0.10 | 1.38 ± 0.08 | 6.033 | 0.022 | |
| 13.57 ± 0.34 | 14.54 ± 0.27 | 4.306 | 0.049 | |
| 2.67 ± 0.14 | 2.31 ± 0.11 | 3.311 | 0.082 | |
| 2.35 ± 0.37 | 3.45 ± 0.29 | 4.745 | 0.040 | |
| 2.55 ± 0.43 | 2.25 ± 0.29 | 0.305 | 0.586 | |
| 4.76 ± 0.34 | 5.51 ± 0.27 | 2.580 | 0.122 | |
| 5.75 ± 0.28 | 6.57 ± 0.21 | 4.800 | 0.039 | |
Values represent correlation coefficients (Coef.) for associations of ambient illumination with melatonin measures from three separate analyses. First, Pearson correlations were run with no control for the covariates. Second, partial correlations were run with control for sleep duration and race. Third, partial correlations were run with control for intraocular pressure (IOP) and cup-to-disk ratio (CDR).
| 0.07 | 0.73 | 0.31 | 0.09 | ||
| -0.50 | 0.01 | 0.18 | 0.35 | ||
| 0.19 | 0.35 | 0.28 | 0.16 | ||
| -0.43 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.88 | ||
| 0.07 | 0.71 | 0.22 | 0.25 | ||
| -0.49 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.61 | ||