Literature DB >> 2740076

Detection of diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmoscopy versus photography--Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report Number 5. The ETDRS Research Group.

J Kinyoun1, F Barton, M Fisher, L Hubbard, L Aiello, F Ferris.   

Abstract

Clinical and photographic methods were used to assess retinopathy during the examinations of diabetic patients enrolled in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS). In analyzing available data from eyes randomly selected for deferral of treatment, the authors compare the clinical detection (including contact lens biomicroscopy) with photographic detection (30 degrees stereoscopic color fundus photographs) of diabetic macular edema. Based on clinical detection, 53% (1778 patients) had hard exudates within 1 disc diameter (DD) of the center of macula, 56% (1868 patients) had retinal thickening within this region, and 31% (1027 patients) had thickening at the center of macula. These analyses show agreements of 83, 78, and 83% between retinal specialists and photographic graders when assessing these three characteristics, respectively. Agreement was 81% in the detection of macular edema for which treatment is indicated (clinically significant macular edema). Each method has its advantages but in general there was close agreement between these methods, particularly for clinically significant macular edema, which supports the reliability of each method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2740076     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32814-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  53 in total

1.  Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in patients with diabetes mellitus diagnosed after the age of 70 years.

Authors:  M Cahill; A Halley; M Codd; N O'Meara; R Firth; D Mooney; R W Acheson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Interpreting thickness changes in the diabetic macula: the problem of short-term variation in optical coherence tomography-measured macular thickening (an american ophthalmological society thesis).

Authors:  David J Browning
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2010-12

Review 3.  Update on Screening for Sight-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Peter H Scanlon
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.892

Review 4.  Retinal imaging and image analysis.

Authors:  Michael D Abràmoff; Mona K Garvin; Milan Sonka
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010

5.  Quantitative assessment of macular thickness in normal subjects and patients with diabetic retinopathy by scanning retinal thickness analyser.

Authors:  Y Oshima; K Emi; S Yamanishi; M Motokura
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Trachomatous Scar Ranking: A Novel Outcome for Trachoma Studies.

Authors:  Angela Baldwin; Alexander M Ryner; Zerihun Tadesse; Ayalew Shiferaw; Kelly Callahan; Dionna M Fry; Zhaoxia Zhou; Thomas M Lietman; Jeremy D Keenan
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.345

7.  The accuracy of digital-video retinal imaging to screen for diabetic retinopathy: an analysis of two digital-video retinal imaging systems using standard stereoscopic seven-field photography and dilated clinical examination as reference standards.

Authors:  Mary Gilbert Lawrence
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004

8.  Correlation of a scanning laser derived oedema index and visual function following grid laser treatment for diabetic macular oedema.

Authors:  C Hudson; J G Flanagan; G S Turner; H C Chen; L B Young; D McLeod
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  [Diagnosis, therapy and follow up of diabetic eye disease].

Authors:  Michael Stur; Stefan Egger; Anton Haas; Gerhard Kieselbach; Stefan Mennel; Reinhard Michl; Michael Roden; Ulrike Stolba; Andreas Wedrich
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.704

10.  Screening for diabetic retinopathy in James Bay, Ontario: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  David Maberley; Hugh Walker; Anita Koushik; Alan Cruess
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.