Literature DB >> 2271016

Blindness and visual impairment in an American urban population. The Baltimore Eye Survey.

J M Tielsch1, A Sommer, K Witt, J Katz, R M Royall.   

Abstract

Data on the prevalence of blindness and visual impairment in multiracial urban populations of the United States are not readily available. The Baltimore Eye Survey was designed to address this lack of information and provide estimates of prevalence in age-race subgroups that had not been well studied in the past. A population-based sample of 5300 blacks and whites from east Baltimore, Md, received an ophthalmologic screening examination that included detailed visual acuity measurements. Blacks had, on average, a twofold excess prevalence of blindness and visual impairment than whites, irrespective of definition. Rates rose dramatically with age for all definitions of vision loss, but there was no difference in prevalence by sex. More than 50% of subjects improved their presenting vision after refractive correction, with 7.5% improving three or more lines. Rates in Baltimore are as high or higher than those reported from previous studies. National projections indicate that greater than 3 million persons are visually impaired, 890,000 of whom are bilaterally blind by US definitions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2271016     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1990.01070040138048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  123 in total

1.  Prevalence of self-rated visual impairment among adults with diabetes.

Authors:  J B Saaddine; K M Narayan; M M Engelgau; R E Aubert; R Klein; G L Beckles
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  World blindness: a 21st century perspective.

Authors:  H R Taylor; J E Keeffe
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Correction of refractive error in the Victorian population: the feasibility of "off the shelf" spectacles.

Authors:  R Maini; J Keeffe; L A Weih; C A McCarty; H R Taylor
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 4.  Socioeconomic status and blindness.

Authors:  R Dandona; L Dandona
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 5.  Why HID headlights bother older drivers.

Authors:  M A Mainster; G T Timberlake
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Vision-specific health-related quality of life: content areas for nursing home residents.

Authors:  Kay Scilley; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Factors associated with undercorrected refractive errors in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.

Authors:  S Thiagalingam; R G Cumming; P Mitchell
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Rehabilitation Referral for Patients With Irreversible Vision Impairment Seen in a Public Safety-Net Eye Clinic.

Authors:  M Austin Coker; Carrie E Huisingh; Gerald McGwin; Russell W Read; Mark W Swanson; Laura E Dreer; Dawn K DeCarlo; Lindsay Gregg; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 7.389

9.  The effect of different monovision contact lens powers on the visual function of emmetropic presbyopic patients (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Daniel S Durrie
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2006

10.  Unrecognised and unregistered visual impairment.

Authors:  R Robinson; J Deutsch; H S Jones; S Youngson-Reilly; D M Hamlin; L Dhurjon; A R Fielder
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.