Literature DB >> 16319209

Canal and otolith contributions to visual orientation constancy during sinusoidal roll rotation.

Ronald G Kaptein1, Jan A M Van Gisbergen.   

Abstract

Using vestibular sensors to maintain visual stability during changes in head tilt, crucial when panoramic cues are not available, presents a computational challenge. Reliance on the otoliths requires a neural strategy for resolving their tilt/translation ambiguity, such as canal-otolith interaction or frequency segregation. The canal signal is subject to bandwidth limitations. In this study, we assessed the relative contribution of canal and otolith signals and investigated how they might be processed and combined. The experimental approach was to explore conditions with and without otolith contributions in a frequency range with various degrees of canal activation. We tested the perceptual stability of visual line orientation in six human subjects during passive sinusoidal roll tilt in the dark at frequencies from 0.05 to 0.4 Hz (30 degrees peak to peak). Because subjects were constantly monitoring spatial motion of a visual line in the frontal plane, the paradigm required moment-to-moment updating for ongoing ego motion. Their task was to judge the total spatial sway of the line when it rotated sinusoidally at various amplitudes. From the responses we determined how the line had to be rotated to be perceived as stable in space. Tests were taken both with (subject upright) and without (subject supine) gravity cues. Analysis of these data showed that the compensation for body rotation in the computation of line orientation in space, although always incomplete, depended on vestibular rotation frequency and on the availability of gravity cues. In the supine condition, the compensation for ego motion showed a steep increase with frequency, compatible with an integrated canal signal. The improvement of performance in the upright condition, afforded by graviceptive cues from the otoliths, showed low-pass characteristics. Simulations showed that a linear combination of an integrated canal signal and a gravity-based signal can account for these results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16319209     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00856.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  12 in total

1.  Angular displacement perception modulated by force background.

Authors:  James R Lackner; Paul DiZio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Direction of balance and perception of the upright are perceptually dissociable.

Authors:  Heather Panic; Alexander Sacha Panic; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Learning dynamic control of body yaw orientation.

Authors:  Vivekanand Pandey Vimal; James R Lackner; Paul DiZio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Human perceptual overestimation of whole body roll tilt in hypergravity.

Authors:  Torin K Clark; Michael C Newman; Charles M Oman; Daniel M Merfeld; Laurence R Young
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Computation of egomotion in the macaque cerebellar vermis.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Tatyana A Yakusheva; Andrea M Green; J David Dickman; Pablo M Blazquez
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Gravity modulates behaviour control strategy.

Authors:  Maria Gallagher; Iqra Arshad; Elisa Raffaella Ferrè
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Frequency-selective coding of translation and tilt in macaque cerebellar nodulus and uvula.

Authors:  Tatyana Yakusheva; Pablo M Blazquez; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Phase-linking and the perceived motion during off-vertical axis rotation.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Scott J Wood; Gin McCollum
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 9.  A vestibular sensation: probabilistic approaches to spatial perception.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Eliana M Klier; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 10.  How vestibular neurons solve the tilt/translation ambiguity. Comparison of brainstem, cerebellum, and thalamus.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Tatyana A Yakusheva
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.