Literature DB >> 19626923

Perception of dialect variation in noise: intelligibility and classification.

Cynthia G Clopper1, Ann R Bradlow.   

Abstract

Listeners can explicitly categorize unfamiliar talkers by regional dialect with above-chance performance under ideal listening conditions. However, the extent to which this important source of variation affects speech processing is largely unknown. In a series of four experiments, we examined the effects of dialect variation on speech intelligibility in noise and the effects of noise on perceptual dialect classification. Results revealed that, on the one hand, dialect-specific differences in speech intelligibility were more pronounced at harder signal-to-noise ratios, but were attenuated under more favorable listening conditions. Listener dialect did not interact with talker dialect; for all listeners, at a range of noise levels, the General American talkers were the most intelligible and the Mid-Atlantic talkers were the least intelligible. Dialect classification performance, on the other hand, was poor even with only moderate amounts of noise. These findings suggest that at moderate noise levels, listeners are able to adapt to dialect variation in the acoustic signal such that some cross-dialect intelligibility differences are neutralized, despite relatively poor explicit dialect classification performance. However, at more difficult noise levels, participants cannot effectively adapt to dialect variation in the acoustic signal and cross-dialect differences in intelligibility emerge for all listeners, regardless of their dialect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19626923      PMCID: PMC2744323          DOI: 10.1177/0023830908098539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  26 in total

1.  Vowel normalization for accent: an investigation of best exemplar locations in northern and southern British English sentences.

Authors:  Bronwen G Evans; Paul Iverson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  English consonant recognition in noise and in reverberation by Japanese and American listeners.

Authors:  Y Takata; A K Nábĕlek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English.

Authors:  Constance M Clarke; Merrill F Garrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perceptual similarity of regional dialects of American English.

Authors:  Cynthia G Clopper; Susannah V Levi; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speaker sex identification from voiced, whispered, and filtered isolated vowels.

Authors:  N J Lass; K R Hughes; M D Bowyer; L T Waters; V T Bourne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Free classification of regional dialects of American English.

Authors:  Cynthia G Clopper; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2007-07

7.  The Nationwide Speech Project: A new corpus of American English dialects.

Authors:  Cynthia G Clopper; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 2.017

8.  Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise.

Authors:  L H Mayo; M Florentine; S Buus
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

10.  Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Nina Kraus; Erin Hayes
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  15 in total

1.  The effects of indexical and phonetic variation on vowel perception in typically developing 9- to 12-year-old children.

Authors:  Ewa Jacewicz; Robert Allen Fox
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Variation in the strength of lexical encoding across dialects.

Authors:  Cynthia G Clopper; Terrin N Tamati; Janet B Pierrehumbert
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2016-07-29

3.  Perceptual adaptation and intelligibility of multiple talkers for two types of degraded speech.

Authors:  Tessa Bent; Adam Buchwald; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Influence of early linguistic experience on regional dialect categorization by an adult cochlear implant user: a case study.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Development, reliability, and validity of PRESTO: a new high-variability sentence recognition test.

Authors:  Jaimie L Gilbert; Terrin N Tamati; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Auditory free classification of nonnative speech.

Authors:  Eriko Atagi; Tessa Bent
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2013-11-01

9.  A Prekindergarten Curriculum Supplement for Enhancing Mainstream American English Knowledge in Nonmainstream American English Speakers.

Authors:  Jan R Edwards; Peggy Rosin
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Talker Versus Dialect Effects on Speech Intelligibility: A Symmetrical Study.

Authors:  Daniel R McCloy; Richard A Wright; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.