Literature DB >> 16315105

Transposable element orientation bias in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Asher D Cutter1, Jeffrey M Good, Christopher T Pappas, Matthew A Saunders, Dean M Starrett, Travis J Wheeler.   

Abstract

Nonrandom distributions of transposable elements can be generated by a variety of genomic features. Using the full D. melanogaster genome as a model, we characterize the orientations of different classes of transposable elements in relation to the directionality of genes. DNA-mediated transposable elements are more likely to be in the same orientation as neighboring genes when they occur in the nontranscribed region's that flank genes. However, RNA-mediated transposable elements located in an intron are more often oriented in the direction opposite to that of the host gene. These orientation biases are strongest for genes with highly biased codon usage, probably reflecting the ability of such loci to respond to weak positive or negative selection. The leading hypothesis for selection against transposable elements in the coding orientation proposes that transcription termination poly(A) signal motifs within retroelements interfere with normal gene transcription. However, after accounting for differences in base composition between the strands, we find no evidence for global selection against spurious transcription termination signals in introns. We therefore conclude that premature termination of host gene transcription due to the presence of poly(A) signal motifs in retroelements might only partially explain strand-specific detrimental effects in the D. melanogaster genome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16315105     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-004-0243-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  48 in total

1.  Transposons but not retrotransposons are located preferentially in regions of high recombination rate in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  L Duret; G Marais; C Biémont
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Does recombination improve selection on codon usage? Lessons from nematode and fly complete genomes.

Authors:  G Marais; D Mouchiroud; L Duret
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Transposable element distribution in Drosophila.

Authors:  C Biémont; A Tsitrone; C Vieira; C Hoogland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  LTR retrotransposons and the evolution of eukaryotic enhancers.

Authors:  J F McDonald; L V Matyunina; S Wilson; I K Jordan; N J Bowen; W J Miller
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  High intrinsic rate of DNA loss in Drosophila.

Authors:  D A Petrov; E R Lozovskaya; D L Hartl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-11-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Drosophila telomeres: two transposable elements with important roles in chromosomes.

Authors:  M L Pardue; P G DeBaryshe
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Nucleotide diversity in gorillas.

Authors:  Ning Yu; Michael I Jensen-Seaman; Leona Chemnick; Oliver Ryder; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  A single p450 allele associated with insecticide resistance in Drosophila.

Authors:  P J Daborn; J L Yen; M R Bogwitz; G Le Goff; E Feil; S Jeffers; N Tijet; T Perry; D Heckel; P Batterham; R Feyereisen; T G Wilson; R H ffrench-Constant
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Retroelements and their impact on genome evolution and functioning.

Authors:  Elena Gogvadze; Anton Buzdin
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Retrotransposons influence the mouse transcriptome: implication for the divergence of genetic traits.

Authors:  Kyoji Horie; Ei-Suke Saito; Vincent W Keng; Ryuji Ikeda; Hiroshi Ishihara; Junji Takeda
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Molecular functions of human endogenous retroviruses in health and disease.

Authors:  Maria Suntsova; Andrew Garazha; Alena Ivanova; Dmitry Kaminsky; Alex Zhavoronkov; Anton Buzdin
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Integration target site selection by a resurrected human endogenous retrovirus.

Authors:  Troy Brady; Young Nam Lee; Keshet Ronen; Nirav Malani; Charles C Berry; Paul D Bieniasz; Frederic D Bushman
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Gene properties and chromatin state influence the accumulation of transposable elements in genes.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Dixie L Mager
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Multiple effects govern endogenous retrovirus survival patterns in human gene introns.

Authors:  Louie N van de Lagemaat; Patrik Medstrand; Dixie L Mager
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Abundance and distribution of transposable elements in two Drosophila QTL mapping resources.

Authors:  Julie M Cridland; Stuart J Macdonald; Anthony D Long; Kevin R Thornton
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Genome-wide assessments reveal extremely high levels of polymorphism of two active families of mouse endogenous retroviral elements.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Irina A Maksakova; Liane Gagnier; Louie N van de Lagemaat; Dixie L Mager
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Testing the palindromic target site model for DNA transposon insertion using the Drosophila melanogaster P-element.

Authors:  Raquel S Linheiro; Casey M Bergman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Visualized computational predictions of transcriptional effects by intronic endogenous retroviruses.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Artem Babaian; Liane Gagnier; Dixie L Mager
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.