Literature DB >> 17435252

Retrotransposons influence the mouse transcriptome: implication for the divergence of genetic traits.

Kyoji Horie1, Ei-Suke Saito, Vincent W Keng, Ryuji Ikeda, Hiroshi Ishihara, Junji Takeda.   

Abstract

Massive accumulation of retrotransposons, comprising >40% of human and mouse genomes, is one of the major events in the evolution of the genome. However, most retrotransposons have lost retrotransposition competency, which makes studying their role in genome evolution elusive. Intracisternal A-particle (IAP) elements are long terminal repeat (LTR)-type mouse retrotransposons consisting of full-length and internally deleted types. Some are retrotransposition competent and their upregulated activity has been reported in mutant mice deficient in genome defense systems, suggesting that IAP elements provide a unique platform for studying the interaction between retrotransposons and mammalian genomes. Using the IAP element as a model case, here we show that mobilization of retrotransposons alters the mouse transcriptome. Retrotransposition assay in cultured cells demonstrated that a subset of internally deleted IAP elements, called IDelta1 type, retrotranspose efficiently when supplied with functional IAP proteins. Furthermore, the IDelta1 type IAP element exhibited substantial transcription-inducing activity in the flanking region. Genomewide transcript analysis of embryonic stem (ES) cells identified IAP-induced transcripts, including fusion transcripts between IAP sequence and endogenous genes. Unexpectedly, nearly half of these IAP elements obtained from ES cells derived from 129 mouse strain were absent in the C57BL/6 genome, suggesting that IAP-driven transcription contributes to the unique trait of the individual mouse strain. On the basis of these data, we propose that retrotransposons are one of the drivers that shape the mammalian transcriptome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17435252      PMCID: PMC1894610          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.071647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  35 in total

1.  Master genes in mammalian repetitive DNA amplification.

Authors:  P L Deininger; M A Batzer; C A Hutchison; M H Edgell
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Transcription of IAP endogenous retroviruses is constrained by cytosine methylation.

Authors:  C P Walsh; J R Chaillet; T H Bestor
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  'Green mice' as a source of ubiquitous green cells.

Authors:  M Okabe; M Ikawa; K Kominami; T Nakanishi; Y Nishimune
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1997-05-05       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 4.  Revolutions in rapid amplification of cDNA ends: new strategies for polymerase chain reaction cloning of full-length cDNA ends.

Authors:  B C Schaefer
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1995-05-20       Impact factor: 3.365

5.  Independent control of immunoglobulin switch recombination at individual switch regions evidenced through Cre-loxP-mediated gene targeting.

Authors:  H Gu; Y R Zou; K Rajewsky
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-06-18       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Detection and cloning of unique integration sites of retrotransposon, intracisternal A-particle element in the genome of acute myeloid leukemia cells in mice.

Authors:  H Ishihara; I Tanaka
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1997-11-24       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 7.  Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites.

Authors:  J A Yoder; C P Walsh; T H Bestor
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  High frequency retrotransposition in cultured mammalian cells.

Authors:  J V Moran; S E Holmes; T P Naas; R J DeBerardinis; J D Boeke; H H Kazazian
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-11-29       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Human-specific integrations of the HERV-K endogenous retrovirus family.

Authors:  P Medstrand; D L Mager
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Autoimmune disease in mice due to integration of an endogenous retrovirus in an apoptosis gene.

Authors:  J Wu; T Zhou; J He; J D Mountz
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1993-08-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  18 in total

1.  Differential sensitivities of retroviruses to integrase strand transfer inhibitors.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Koh; Kenneth A Matreyek; Alan Engelman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 2.  Transposable elements as drivers of genomic and biological diversity in vertebrates.

Authors:  Astrid Böhne; Frédéric Brunet; Delphine Galiana-Arnoux; Christina Schultheis; Jean-Nicolas Volff
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Translation from nonautonomous type IAP retrotransposon is a critical determinant of transposition activity: implication for retrotransposon-mediated genome evolution.

Authors:  Ei-Suke Saito; Vincent W Keng; Junji Takeda; Kyoji Horie
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  P bodies inhibit retrotransposition of endogenous intracisternal a particles.

Authors:  Chunye Lu; Xavier Contreras; B Matija Peterlin
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  A novel active endogenous retrovirus family contributes to genome variability in rat inbred strains.

Authors:  Yongming Wang; Frantisek Liska; Claudia Gosele; Lucie Sedová; Vladimír Kren; Drahomíra Krenová; Zoltán Ivics; Norbert Hubner; Zsuzsanna Izsvák
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Longitudinal effects of developmental bisphenol A and variable diet exposures on epigenetic drift in mice.

Authors:  Joseph Kochmanski; Elizabeth H Marchlewicz; Matthew Savidge; Luke Montrose; Christopher Faulk; Dana C Dolinoy
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.143

7.  Extensive variation between inbred mouse strains due to endogenous L1 retrotransposition.

Authors:  Keiko Akagi; Jingfeng Li; Robert M Stephens; Natalia Volfovsky; David E Symer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  How do mammalian transposons induce genetic variation? A conceptual framework: the age, structure, allele frequency, and genome context of transposable elements may define their wide-ranging biological impacts.

Authors:  Keiko Akagi; Jingfeng Li; David E Symer
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 9.  The L1 retrotransposition assay: a retrospective and toolkit.

Authors:  Sanjida H Rangwala; Haig H Kazazian
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 3.608

10.  Remodeling yeast gene transcription by activating the Ty1 long terminal repeat retrotransposon under severe adenine deficiency.

Authors:  Géraldine Servant; Carole Pennetier; Pascale Lesage
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.