Literature DB >> 10840067

Absence of toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis pollen to black swallowtails under field conditions.

C L Wraight1, A R Zangerl, M J Carroll, M R Berenbaum.   

Abstract

A single laboratory study on monarch butterflies has prompted widespread concern that corn pollen, engineered to express Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) endotoxin, might travel beyond corn fields and cause mortality in nontarget lepidopterans. Among the lepidopterans at high potential risk from this technology is the black swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polyxenes, whose host plants in the midwestern U. S. are located principally in narrow strips between roads and crop fields. A field study was performed to assess whether mortality of early instar black swallowtails was associated either with proximity to a field of Bt corn or by levels of Bt pollen deposition on host plants. Potted host plants were infested with first instar black swallowtails and placed at intervals from the edge of a field of Bt corn (Pioneer 34R07 containing Monsanto event 810) at the beginning of anthesis. We confirmed by ELISA that pollen from these plants contained Cry1Ab endotoxin (2.125 +/- 0.289 ng/g). Although many of the larvae died during the 7 days that the experiments were run, there was no relationship between mortality and proximity to the field or pollen deposition on host plants. Moreover, pollen from these same plants failed to cause mortality in the laboratory at the highest pollen dose tested (10,000 grains/cm(2)), a level that far exceeded the highest pollen density observed in the field (200 grains/cm(2)). We conclude that Bt pollen of the variety tested is unlikely to affect wild populations of black swallowtails. Thus, our results suggest that at least some potential nontarget effects of the use of transgenic plants may be manageable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10840067      PMCID: PMC16607          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.130202097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  4 in total

1.  Cautionary tale on safety of GM crops.

Authors:  J E Beringer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Monarch Bt-corn paper questioned.

Authors:  J Hodgson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  False reports and the ears of men.

Authors:  A M Shelton; R T Roush
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae.

Authors:  J E Losey; L S Rayor; M E Carter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-05-20       Impact factor: 49.962

  4 in total
  18 in total

Review 1.  Agricultural biotechnology: myth and measurement.

Authors:  J S McLaren
Journal:  Mol Diagn       Date:  2000-12

2.  Bt corn pollen impacts on nontarget lepidoptera: assessment of effects in nature.

Authors:  D S Pimentel; P H Raven
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Bt or not Bt: is that the question?

Authors:  J M Scriber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Is opposition to GM crops science or politics? An investigation into the arguments that GM crops pose a particular threat to the environment.

Authors:  A Trewavas; C Leaver
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 5.  Assessment of possible ecological risks and hazards of transgenic fish with implications for other sexually reproducing organisms.

Authors:  William M Muir; Richard D Howard
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  Evaluating the induced-odour emission of a Bt maize and its attractiveness to parasitic wasps.

Authors:  Ted C J Turlings; Philippe M Jeanbourquin; Matthias Held; Thomas Degen
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 7.  Will transgenic plants adversely affect the environment?

Authors:  Vassili V Velkov; Alexander B Medvinsky; Mikhail S Sokolov; Anatoly I Marchenko
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  A sequential approach to risk assessment of transgenic plants expressing protease inhibitors: effects on nontarget herbivorous insects.

Authors:  S E Cowgill; H J Atkinson
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  A mathematical model of exposure of non-target Lepidoptera to Bt-maize pollen expressing Cry1Ab within Europe.

Authors:  J N Perry; Y Devos; S Arpaia; D Bartsch; A Gathmann; R S Hails; J Kiss; K Lheureux; B Manachini; S Mestdagh; G Neemann; F Ortego; J Schiemann; J B Sweet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  Is the German suspension of MON810 maize cultivation scientifically justified?

Authors:  Agnès Ricroch; Jean Baptiste Bergé; Marcel Kuntz
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.788

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.