Literature DB >> 16313669

Replicability, confidence, and priors.

Peter R Killeen1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2005        PMID： 16313669      PMCID： PMC1440522          DOI： 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01653.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN： 0956-7976


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  The p-value fallacy and how to avoid it.

Authors:  Peter Dixon
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2003-09

2.  Statistical testing and null distributions: what to do when samples are not random.

Authors:  Michael A Hunter; Richard B May
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2003-09

3.  An alternative to null-hypothesis significance tests.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-05

4.  Still much to learn about confidence intervals: reply to Rounder and Morey (2005).

Authors:  Fiona Fidler; Neil Thomason; Geoff Cumming; Sue Finch; Joanna Leeman
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-06

5.  Why replication probabilities depend on prior probability distributions: a rejoinder to Killeen (2005).

Authors:  Ranald R Macdonald
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-12

6.  Probability of replication revisited: comment on "An alternative to Null-Hypothesis Significance Tests.".

Authors:  Gheorghe Doros; Andrew B Geier
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-12

7.  Understanding the average probability of replication: comment on Killeen (2005).

Authors:  Geoff Cumming
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-12

8.  Bayesian statistical inference in psychology: comment on Trafimow (2003).

Authors:  Michael D Lee; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 8.934
  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Replication is not coincidence: reply to Iverson, Lee, and Wagenmakers (2009).

Authors:  Bruno Lecoutre; Peter R Killeen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-04

2.  Beyond statistical inference: a decision theory for science.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-08

3.  A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

Review 4.  The importance of proving the null.

Authors:  C R Gallistel
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  P(rep) misestimates the probability of replication.

Authors:  Geoffrey J Iverson; Michael D Lee; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

6.  BETTER STATISTICS FOR BETTER DECISIONS: REJECTING NULL HYPOTHESES STATISTICAL TESTS IN FAVOR OF REPLICATION STATISTICS.

Authors:  Federico Sanabria; Peter R Killeen
Journal:  Psychol Sch       Date:  2007-05

7.  Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness Against Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.821

8.  The Prep statistic as a measure of confidence in model fitting.

Authors:  F Gregory Ashby; Jeffrey B O'Brien
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

9.  Number of events and reliability in fMRI.

Authors:  Benjamin O Turner; Michael B Miller
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.526

10.  How large should the next study be? Predictive power and sample size requirements for replication studies.

Authors:  Erik W van Zwet; Steven N Goodman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.497
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.