Literature DB >> 15869691

An alternative to null-hypothesis significance tests.

Peter R Killeen1.   

Abstract

The statistic p(rep) estimates the probability of replicating an effect. It captures traditional publication criteria for signal-to-noise ratio, while avoiding parametric inference and the resulting Bayesian dilemma. In concert with effect size and replication intervals, p(rep) provides all of the information now used in evaluating research, while avoiding many of the pitfalls of traditional statistical inference.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15869691      PMCID: PMC1473027          DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01538.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  11 in total

1.  Null hypothesis significance testing: a review of an old and continuing controversy.

Authors:  R S Nickerson
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2000-06

2.  Review of assumptions and problems in the appropriate conceptualization of effect size.

Authors:  R J Grissom; J J Kim
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2001-06

3.  r equivalent: A simple effect size indicator.

Authors:  Robert Rosenthal; Donald B Rubin
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2003-12

4.  Estimating the mean effect size in meta-analysis: bias, precision, and mean squared error of different weighting methods.

Authors:  Wim Van Den Noortgate; Patrick Onghena
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-11

5.  A meta-analysis of massage therapy research.

Authors:  Christopher A Moyer; James Rounds; James W Hannum
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 6.  Hypothesis testing and theory evaluation at the boundaries: surprising insights from Bayes's theorem.

Authors:  David Trafimow
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Effect sizes and p values: what should be reported and what should be replicated?

Authors:  A G Greenwald; R Gonzalez; R J Harris; D Guthrie
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 8.  Understanding research synthesis (meta-analysis).

Authors:  F Mosteller; G A Colditz
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 21.981

9.  Psychophysiology of aggression, psychopathy, and conduct problems: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael F Lorber
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men.

Authors:  Alice H Eagly; Mary C Johannesen-Schmidt; Marloes L van Engen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  74 in total

1.  Bad statistical practice in pharmacology (and other basic biomedical disciplines): you probably don't know P.

Authors:  Michael J Lew
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Visual feature binding requires reentry.

Authors:  Seth Bouvier; Anne Treisman
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-01-08

3.  Probability discounting of gains and losses: implications for risk attitudes and impulsivity.

Authors:  N Will Shead; David C Hodgins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Replicability, confidence, and priors.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-12

5.  Beyond statistical inference: a decision theory for science.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-08

6.  A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

7.  Choking under pressure and working memory capacity: when performance pressure reduces fluid intelligence.

Authors:  David Gimmig; Pascal Huguet; Jean-Paul Caverni; François Cury
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

8.  Parental education moderates genetic influences on reading disability.

Authors:  Angela Friend; John C DeFries; Richard K Olson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-11

9.  Sex differences in rhesus monkey toy preferences parallel those of children.

Authors:  Janice M Hassett; Erin R Siebert; Kim Wallen
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 3.587

10.  The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Kit Ying Chan; Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.