Literature DB >> 18990595

Navel jewelry artifacts and intravertebral variation in spine bone densitometry in adolescents and young women.

Susan M Ott1, Laura E Ichikawa, Andrea Z LaCroix, Delia Scholes.   

Abstract

Non-removable navel jewelry can increase the measured bone density of the underlying vertebra. We measured lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in an observational study of 727 adolescents and young women aged 14-30 yr. We evaluated several methods of correcting BMD: manually erasing a small area, eliminating 1 or 2 vertebrae, estimating the BMD from 1 or 2 vertebrae using data from remaining vertebrae, and estimating the BMD using T-scores of the remaining vertebrae. Ten percent (n=71) of the subjects were wearing navel jewelry. The areal BMD by DXA of L1 and L2 was similar in those with jewels as in controls without jewels, but L3-L4 showed higher bone density in those with jewelry, and the spine BMD of L1-L4 was significantly higher in the bejeweled women (1.043+/-0.011 vs 1.006+/-0.004 g/cm2, p=0.01). The estimated errors in accuracy (g/cm2) were 0.034 due to the jewels; 0.005 from erasing a small area; 0.019 from eliminating L4; 0.044 from eliminating both L3 and L4; 0.016 from predicting BMD using L1-L3; and 0.028 using L1-L2. The T-scores using the Hologic database were progressively lower in the caudal vertebrae, even in 96 local women aged 30-35 yr, whose average T-score was 0.35 at L1 but -0.26 at L4. Thus, we found significant errors due to intravertebral variability. We suggest the optimal method of correcting for small artifacts is to erase the area under the artifact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18990595      PMCID: PMC2692464          DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2008.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  14 in total

1.  Prevalence of body art (body piercing and tattooing) in university undergraduates and incidence of medical complications.

Authors:  Lester B Mayers; Daniel A Judelson; Barry W Moriarty; Kenneth W Rundell
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  Quality and performance measures in bone densitometry: part 1: errors and diagnosis.

Authors:  K Engelke; C-C Glüer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Body art (body piercing and tattooing) among undergraduate university students: "then and now".

Authors:  Lester B Mayers; Sheila H Chiffriller
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques.

Authors:  C C Glüer; G Blake; Y Lu; B A Blunt; M Jergas; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Calcium supplement ingestion may alter lumbar spine bone mineral density measurement.

Authors:  Diane Krueger; Mary Checovich; Dessa Gemar; Xiaodan Wei; Neil Binkley
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Tattoos and body piercings in the United States: a national data set.

Authors:  Anne E Laumann; Amy J Derick
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 8.  Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Authors:  Nelson B Watts
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-08-21       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The effect of common artifacts lateral to the spine on bone mineral density in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Sarah L Morgan; Robert Lopez-Ben; Nancy Nunnally; Leandria Burroughs; Naomi Fineberg; R Shane Tubbs; Michael V Yester
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurement in daily practice.

Authors:  M C Lodder; W F Lems; H J Ader; A E Marthinsen; S C C M van Coeverden; P Lips; J C Netelenbos; B A C Dijkmans; J C Roos
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 19.103

View more
  5 in total

1.  Oral contraceptive use and bone density change in adolescent and young adult women: a prospective study of age, hormone dose, and discontinuation.

Authors:  Delia Scholes; Rebecca A Hubbard; Laura E Ichikawa; Andrea Z LaCroix; Leslie Spangler; Jeannette M Beasley; Susan Reed; Susan M Ott
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Lower extremity fat mass is associated with insulin resistance in overweight and obese individuals: the CARDIA study.

Authors:  Christina M Shay; Mercedes R Carnethon; Timothy R Church; Arlene L Hankinson; Cheeling Chan; David R Jacobs; Cora E Lewis; Pamela J Schreiner; Barbara Sternfeld; Stephen Sidney
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 5.002

3.  Is protein intake associated with bone mineral density in young women?

Authors:  Jeannette M Beasley; Laura E Ichikawa; Brett A Ange; Leslie Spangler; Andrea Z LaCroix; Susan M Ott; Delia Scholes
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Oral contraceptive use and bone density in adolescent and young adult women.

Authors:  Delia Scholes; Laura Ichikawa; Andrea Z LaCroix; Leslie Spangler; Jeannette M Beasley; Susan Reed; Susan M Ott
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Lumbar spine and total-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in children with severe neurological impairment and intellectual disability: a pilot study of artefacts and disrupting factors.

Authors:  S Mergler; R Rieken; D Tibboel; H M Evenhuis; R R van Rijn; C Penning
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-01-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.