Literature DB >> 16932950

[Antiosteoporosis medication: useful monitoring, and how long should such treatment be continued?].

W Demary1.   

Abstract

The improved options for effective treatment of osteoporosis and the shift to treatment strategies based on each patient's absolute fracture risk raise new questions in daily clinical care. Which patient should have what osteoprotective therapy and when and for how long? What techniques can be used to assess the individual effects of novel therapeuties? Are the results yielded by these techniques affected by concomitant factors? What specific characteristics need to be taken account of in rheumatological clinics and how should we deal with these? What is the impact of patient compliance on the assessment of therapeutic effects? This review is intended to shed some light on these questions and on the new DVO guidelines in daily practice with reference to the ambulatory setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16932950     DOI: 10.1007/s00393-006-0087-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Rheumatol        ISSN: 0340-1855            Impact factor:   1.372


  21 in total

1.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover, endogenous hormones and the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women: the OFELY study.

Authors:  P Garnero; E Sornay-Rendu; B Claustrat; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  What is the role of DXA, QUS and bone markers in fracture prediction, treatment allocation and monitoring?

Authors:  Karine Briot; Christian Roux
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.098

Review 3.  Long-term safety of bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Uri A Liberman
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 4.  Use of oral corticosteroids and risk of fractures.

Authors:  T P Van Staa; H G Leufkens; L Abenhaim; B Zhang; C Cooper
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 5.  Narrative [corrected] review: bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaws.

Authors:  Sook-Bin Woo; John W Hellstein; John R Kalmar
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture.

Authors:  R Lindsay; S L Silverman; C Cooper; D A Hanley; I Barton; S B Broy; A Licata; L Benhamou; P Geusens; K Flowers; H Stracke; E Seeman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Evaluation of bone mineral density, hormones, biochemical markers of bone metabolism, and osteoprotegerin serum levels in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Helmut Franck; Thomas Meurer; Lorenz Christian Hofbauer
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.666

8.  Fractures in rheumatoid arthritis: an evaluation of associated risk factors.

Authors:  B A Michel; D A Bloch; F Wolfe; J F Fries
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 9.  Precision assessment and radiation safety for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: position paper of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  Sanford Baim; Charles R Wilson; E Michael Lewiecki; Marjorie M Luckey; Robert W Downs; Brian C Lentle
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  The effect on behavior and bone mineral density of individualized bone mineral density feedback and educational interventions in premenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial [NCT00273260].

Authors:  Tania Winzenberg; Brian Oldenburg; Sue Frendin; Laura De Wit; Malcolm Riley; Graeme Jones
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.