Literature DB >> 16301198

Setting up an osteoporosis fracture liaison service: background and potential outcomes.

Stephen J Gallacher1.   

Abstract

A large evidence base now exists for treatment interventions that will reduce fracture risk. However, the key area of practice now is how to get this evidence base into clinical practice. All health-care systems are subject to financial constraints, and therefore it is important that all areas of clinical practice can demonstrate that they are able to deliver care in a cost-effective manner. It has become increasingly recognized within the area of osteoporosis that treatment interventions should be targeted at patients at the highest absolute risk of fracture in order to maximize the cost-effectiveness of the service. One key subgroup of patients who are at higher absolute fracture risk are patients who present with an incident fracture. Although it has long been recognized that this is a key group to be considered for investigation and intervention, it is also clear that any form of structured care for this group has not been developed. This chapter will review the background and practical aspects of running a fracture liaison service. This service addresses the issue of secondary prevention of fracture while also considering both the absolute risk of fracture and the absolute benefit of the intervention. Issues relating to the background evidence base underpinning the service as well as the practical issues relating to the actual running of a service are discussed. Some of the potential service outcomes are also reviewed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16301198     DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2005.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 1521-6942            Impact factor:   4.098


  12 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic drugs to prevent secondary fragility fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  T Saito; J M Sterbenz; S Malay; L Zhong; M P MacEachern; K C Chung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: evaluation of the Amiens University Hospital's fracture liaison service between January 2010 and December 2011.

Authors:  N Dehamchia-Rehailia; D Ursu; I Henry-Desailly; P Fardellone; J Paccou
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Bone mineral density testing after fragility fracture: Informative test results likely.

Authors:  Joshua Posen; Dorcas E Beaton; Joanna Sale; Earl R Bogoch
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Coordinator-based systems for secondary prevention in fragility fracture patients.

Authors:  D Marsh; K Akesson; D E Beaton; E R Bogoch; S Boonen; M-L Brandi; A R McLellan; P J Mitchell; J E M Sale; D A Wahl
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Systematic review on interventions to improve osteoporosis investigation and treatment in fragility fracture patients.

Authors:  J E M Sale; D Beaton; J Posen; V Elliot-Gibson; E Bogoch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Bone care nurses and the evolution of the nurse's educational function: the Guardian Angel(®) research project.

Authors:  Rosaria Alvaro; Annalisa Pennini; Emanuela Basilici Zannetti; Noemi Cittadini; Maurizio Feola; Cecilia Rao; Fabio D'Agostino; Ercole Vellone; Umberto Tarantino
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2015 Jan-Apr

7.  Meeting international standards of secondary fracture prevention: a survey on Fracture Liaison Services in the Netherlands.

Authors:  P van den Berg; D H Schweitzer; P M M van Haard; J P van den Bergh; P P Geusens
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Fracture Liaison Services: the UK experience.

Authors:  P J Mitchell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  A review of patient-centred post-fracture interventions in the context of theories of health behaviour change.

Authors:  R Sujic; M A Gignac; R Cockerill; D E Beaton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Patient perceptions of provider barriers to post-fracture secondary prevention.

Authors:  J E M Sale; E Bogoch; G Hawker; M Gignac; D Beaton; S Jaglal; L Frankel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.