RATIONALE: Animal models of tobacco addiction rely on administration of nicotine alone or nicotine combined with isolated constituents. Models using tobacco extracts derived from tobacco products and containing a range of tobacco constituents might more accurately simulate tobacco exposure in humans. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of nicotine alone and an aqueous smokeless tobacco extract in several addiction-related animal behavioral models. METHODS: Nicotine alone and nicotine dose-equivalent concentrations of extract were compared in terms of their acute effects on intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) thresholds, discriminative stimulus effects, and effects on locomotor activity. RESULTS: Similar levels of nicotine and minor alkaloids were achieved using either artificial saliva or saline for extraction, supporting the clinical relevance of the saline extracts used in these studies. Extract produced reinforcement-enhancing (ICSS threshold-decreasing) effects similar to those of nicotine alone at low to moderate nicotine doses, but reduced reinforcement-attenuating (ICSS threshold-increasing) effects at a high nicotine dose. In rats trained to discriminate nicotine alone from saline, intermediate extract doses did not substitute for the training dose as well as nicotine alone. Locomotor stimulant effects and nicotine distribution to brain were similar following administration of extract or nicotine alone. CONCLUSIONS: The reinforcement-attenuating and discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine delivered in an extract of a commercial smokeless tobacco product differed from those of nicotine alone. Extracts of tobacco products may be useful for evaluating the abuse liability of those products and understanding the role of non-nicotine constituents in tobacco addiction.
RATIONALE: Animal models of tobacco addiction rely on administration of nicotine alone or nicotine combined with isolated constituents. Models using tobacco extracts derived from tobacco products and containing a range of tobacco constituents might more accurately simulate tobacco exposure in humans. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of nicotine alone and an aqueous smokeless tobacco extract in several addiction-related animal behavioral models. METHODS:Nicotine alone and nicotine dose-equivalent concentrations of extract were compared in terms of their acute effects on intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) thresholds, discriminative stimulus effects, and effects on locomotor activity. RESULTS: Similar levels of nicotine and minor alkaloids were achieved using either artificial saliva or saline for extraction, supporting the clinical relevance of the saline extracts used in these studies. Extract produced reinforcement-enhancing (ICSS threshold-decreasing) effects similar to those of nicotine alone at low to moderate nicotine doses, but reduced reinforcement-attenuating (ICSS threshold-increasing) effects at a high nicotine dose. In rats trained to discriminate nicotine alone from saline, intermediate extract doses did not substitute for the training dose as well as nicotine alone. Locomotor stimulant effects and nicotine distribution to brain were similar following administration of extract or nicotine alone. CONCLUSIONS: The reinforcement-attenuating and discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine delivered in an extract of a commercial smokeless tobacco product differed from those of nicotine alone. Extracts of tobacco products may be useful for evaluating the abuse liability of those products and understanding the role of non-nicotine constituents in tobacco addiction.
Authors: Martin Skott; Troels T Andreassen; Michael Ulrich-Vinther; X Chen; Dan E Keyler; Mark G LeSage; Paul R Pentel; Joan E Bechtold; Kjeld Soballe Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Junran Cao; James D Belluzzi; Sandra E Loughlin; Daniel E Keyler; Paul R Pentel; Frances M Leslie Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2007-02-07 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Andrew C Harris; Laura Tally; Clare E Schmidt; Peter Muelken; Irina Stepanov; Subhrakanti Saha; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Mark G LeSage Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Tracy T Smith; Laura E Rupprecht; Rachel L Denlinger-Apte; Jillian J Weeks; Rachel S Panas; Eric C Donny; Alan F Sved Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: M G LeSage; M Staley; P Muelken; J R Smethells; I Stepanov; R I Vogel; P R Pentel; A C Harris Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Tracy T Smith; Matthew B Schaff; Laura E Rupprecht; Rachel L Schassburger; Deanne M Buffalari; Sharon E Murphy; Alan F Sved; Eric C Donny Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2015-07-13 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Matthew R Costello; Daisy D Reynaga; Celina Y Mojica; Nurulain T Zaveri; James D Belluzzi; Frances M Leslie Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2014-02-11 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Dorothy K Hatsukami; Neal L Benowitz; Eric Donny; Jack Henningfield; Mitch Zeller Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 4.244