Literature DB >> 16294583

Full-field breast tomosynthesis.

Andrew Smith1.   

Abstract

Breast tomosynthesis is a 3-dimensional (3-D) imaging technology that involves acquiring images of a stationary compressed breast at multiple angles during a short scan. The individual images are then reconstructed into a series of thin high-resolution slices that displayed individually or in a dynamic ciné mode. Tomosynthesis can reduce or eliminate the tissue overlap effect. While holding the breast stationary, images are acquired at a nsumber of different x-ray source angles. Objects at different heights in the breast project differently for each angle. The final step in the tomosynthesis procedure is reconstructing the data to generate images that enhance objects from a given height by appropriate shifting of the projections relative to one another. There are 3 specific areas in tomosynthesis system requirements that warrant a closer review: detector efficiency and dose, field of view, and equipment geometry. The breast is compressed in a standard way. While holding the breast stationary, the x-ray tube is rotated over a limited angular range. A series of low dose exposures are made every few degrees, creating a series of digital images. Typically, the tuben is rotated about +/-15 degrees, and 11 exposures are made every 3 degrees during a total scan of a few seconds. The individual images are projections through the breast at different angles and these arewhat are reconstructed into slices. There are 2 basic tomosynthesis system designs that diiffer in the motion of the detector during acquisition. One method moves the detector in concert with the x-ray tube so as to maintain the shadow of the breast on the detector. An altemate method is to keep the detector stationary relative to the breast platform. The tomosynthesis reconstruction process consists of computing high-resolution images whose planes are parallel to the breast support plates. Typically, these images are reconstructed with slice separation of 1 mm; thus, a 5 cm compressed breast tomosynthesis study will have 50 reconstructed slices. The reconstructed tomosynthesis slices can be displayed similarly to computed tomography (CT) reconstructed slices. Tomosynthesis could resolve many of the tissue overlap reading problems that are a major source of the need for recalls and additional imaging in 2-D mammography exams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16294583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Manage        ISSN: 0198-7097


  13 in total

1.  Thick slices from tomosynthesis data sets: phantom study for the evaluation of different algorithms.

Authors:  Felix Diekmann; Henning Meyer; Susanne Diekmann; Sylvie Puong; Serge Muller; Ulrich Bick; Patrik Rogalla
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Junqiang Lei; Pin Yang; Li Zhang; Yinzhong Wang; Kehu Yang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Analysis of parenchymal texture with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison with digital mammography and implications for cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Despina Kontos; Lynda C Ikejimba; Predrag R Bakic; Andrea B Troxel; Emily F Conant; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Differentiation of BIRADS-4 small breast lesions via Multimodal Ultrasound Tomography.

Authors:  G Zografos; P Liakou; D Koulocheri; I Liovarou; M Sofras; S Hadjiagapis; M Orme; V Marmarelis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Reply to Letter to the Editor re: Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Junqiang Lei; Pin Yang; Li Zhang; Yinzhong Wang; Kehu Yang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Computed tomography for imaging the breast.

Authors:  John M Boone; Alex L C Kwan; Kai Yang; George W Burkett; Karen K Lindfors; Thomas R Nelson
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

9.  Comparative effectiveness of combined digital mammography and tomosynthesis screening for women with dense breasts.

Authors:  Christoph I Lee; Mucahit Cevik; Oguzhan Alagoz; Brian L Sprague; Anna N A Tosteson; Diana L Miglioretti; Karla Kerlikowske; Natasha K Stout; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Scott D Ramsey; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Modern breast cancer detection: a technological review.

Authors:  Adam B Nover; Shami Jagtap; Waqas Anjum; Hakki Yegingil; Wan Y Shih; Wei-Heng Shih; Ari D Brooks
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2009-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.