Literature DB >> 24442445

Reply to Letter to the Editor re: Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis.

Junqiang Lei1, Pin Yang, Li Zhang, Yinzhong Wang, Kehu Yang.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24442445     DOI： 10.1007/s00330-013-3092-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN： 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  Full-field breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Andrew Smith
Journal:  Radiol Manage       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct

2.  Clinical experience of photon counting breast tomosynthesis: comparison with traditional mammography.

Authors:  Gunilla Svane; Edward Azavedo; Karin Lindman; Mattias Urech; Jonas Nilsson; Niclas Weber; Lars Lindqvist; Christer Ullberg
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 3.  Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications.

Authors:  Jeong Mi Park; Edmund A Franken; Megha Garg; Laurie L Fajardo; Loren T Niklason
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Junqiang Lei; Pin Yang; Li Zhang; Yinzhong Wang; Kehu Yang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Alicia Toledano; Cosimo di Maggio; Enrica Baldan; Elisabetta Bezzon; Manuela La Grassa; Luigi Pescarini; Ilaria Polico; Alessandro Proietti; Aida Toffoli; Pier Carlo Muzzio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.

Authors:  David Gur; Gordon S Abrams; Denise M Chough; Marie A Ganott; Christiane M Hakim; Ronald L Perrin; Grace Y Rathfon; Jules H Sumkin; Margarita L Zuley; Andriy I Bandos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography and breast ultrasound: a multireader performance study.

Authors:  Fabienne Thibault; Clarisse Dromain; Catherine Breucq; Corinne S Balleyguier; Caroline Malhaire; Luc Steyaert; Anne Tardivon; Enrica Baldan; Harir Drevon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  M J Michell; A Iqbal; R K Wasan; D R Evans; C Peacock; C P Lawinski; A Douiri; R Wilson; P Whelehan
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  T M Svahn; D P Chakraborty; D Ikeda; S Zackrisson; Y Do; S Mattsson; I Andersson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings.

Authors:  Ingvar Andersson; Debra M Ikeda; Sophia Zackrisson; Mark Ruschin; Tony Svahn; Pontus Timberg; Anders Tingberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315
View more
  2 in total

1.  [Low-dose digital breast tomosynthsis imaging via noise correlation based penalized weighted least-squares algorithm].

Authors:  Meiling Chen; Xi Tao; Huayong Li; Wufan Chen; Hua Zhang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-01-30

2.  Preliminary study on identification of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer subtypes based on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) texture analysis.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Yunting Hu; Hui Li; Yuanliang Xie; Xiang Wang; Weijia Wan
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.