Literature DB >> 16293977

Effects of corneal thickness, curvature, astigmatism and direction of gaze on Goldmann applanation tonometry readings.

Gunilla Rask1, Anders Behndig.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of various sources of error in Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT).
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effect of corneal thickness, curvature, astigmatism and direction of gaze as sources of error in GAT.
METHODS: Orbscan-II (Bausch & Lomb, Inc., Rochester, N.Y., USA) examinations were made on 30 healthy subjects and 9 keratoconus patients, and the intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured with GAT centrally, temporally and inferiorly, with the tonometer prism set horizontally and vertically. Orbscan-II images from 50 younger subjects and 49 older subjects were analysed retrospectively.
RESULTS: IOP was lower on nasal gaze (p = 0.009) but higher on upward gaze (p < 0.001) compared with forward gaze. IOP and the corneal thickness were independently correlated (R(2) = 0.04; p = 0.003), as were the difference in astigmatic vector in the horizontal and vertical meridians and the difference in IOP measured with a horizontal and vertical prism (R(2) = 0.17; p < 0.001). No correlation between IOP and corneal curvature was found. In the keratoconus patients, IOPs were generally low, with large astigmatic differences.
CONCLUSIONS: Corneal thickness, astigmatism and direction of gaze are clinically important sources of error in GAT. IOP should preferably be measured with the prism both horizontally and vertically. If only one direction is chosen, a vertical prism is less sensitive to different directions of gaze. Direction of gaze should be carefully monitored, especially in an irregular cornea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16293977     DOI: 10.1159/000089762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Res        ISSN: 0030-3747            Impact factor:   2.892


  8 in total

1.  Cornea plana associated with open-angle glaucoma: a case report.

Authors:  Bilge Ozturk Sahin; Goktug Seymenoglu; Esin F Baser
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Comparing the Tonojet disposable tonometer with the traditional Goldmann tonometer in glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  S M J Farrell; I Dooley; E O'Connell; S Bashir; A Foley-Nolan; F Kearns; P Logan; T Fulcher
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  M L Salvetat; M Zeppieri; F Miani; C Tosoni; L Parisi; P Brusini
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Comparison of Three Tonometers in Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Eyes That Underwent Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy.

Authors:  Robert Edward T Ang; Neiman Vincent R Bargas; Gladness Henna A Martinez; George Michael N Sosuan; Maria Isabel Nabor-Umali
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-27

5.  Effect of corneal astigmatism on intraocular pressure measurement using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer.

Authors:  Mana Hagishima; Kazutaka Kamiya; Fusako Fujimura; Tetsuya Morita; Nobuyuki Shoji; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Effect of central corneal thickness on Goldmann applanation tonometry measures - a different result with different pachymeters.

Authors:  Michael J Doughty; Sven Jonuscheit
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Intra-Ocular Pressure Measurement in a Patient with a Thin, Thick or Abnormal Cornea.

Authors:  Colin I Clement; Douglas G A Parker; Ivan Goldberg
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2016-02-29

8.  Comparison of Non-contact Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Measurements in Non-pathologic High Myopia.

Authors:  Peiyuan Wang; Yunhe Song; Fengbin Lin; Zhenyu Wang; Xinbo Gao; Weijing Cheng; Meiling Chen; Yuying Peng; Yuhong Liu; Xiulan Zhang; Shida Chen
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.